2023-09-22 16:32:36

by Justin Stitt

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] leds: lp3952: replace deprecated strncpy with strscpy

`strncpy` is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings
[1] and as such we should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string
interfaces.

We expect `dest` to be NUL-terminated due to its use with dev_err.

lp3952_get_label()'s dest argument is priv->leds[i].name:
| acpi_ret = lp3952_get_label(&priv->client->dev, led_name_hdl[i],
| priv->leds[i].name);
... which is then assigned to:
| priv->leds[i].cdev.name = priv->leds[i].name;
... which is used with a format string
| dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
| "couldn't register LED %s\n",
| priv->leds[i].cdev.name);

There is no indication that NUL-padding is required but if it is let's
opt for strscpy_pad.

Considering the above, a suitable replacement is `strscpy` [2] due to
the fact that it guarantees NUL-termination on the destination buffer
without unnecessarily NUL-padding.

Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings [1]
Link: https://manpages.debian.org/testing/linux-manual-4.8/strscpy.9.en.html [2]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <[email protected]>
---
Note: build-tested only.
---
drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c
index 3bd55652a706..62ade3f05a87 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int lp3952_get_label(struct device *dev, const char *label, char *dest)
if (ret)
return ret;

- strncpy(dest, str, LP3952_LABEL_MAX_LEN);
+ strscpy(dest, str, LP3952_LABEL_MAX_LEN);
return 0;
}


---
base-commit: 2cf0f715623872823a72e451243bbf555d10d032
change-id: 20230922-strncpy-drivers-leds-leds-lp3952-c-666fcfabeebd

Best regards,
--
Justin Stitt <[email protected]>


2023-09-24 07:57:30

by Kees Cook

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: lp3952: replace deprecated strncpy with strscpy

On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 03:27:17PM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> `strncpy` is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings
> [1] and as such we should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string
> interfaces.
>
> We expect `dest` to be NUL-terminated due to its use with dev_err.
>
> lp3952_get_label()'s dest argument is priv->leds[i].name:
> | acpi_ret = lp3952_get_label(&priv->client->dev, led_name_hdl[i],
> | priv->leds[i].name);
> ... which is then assigned to:
> | priv->leds[i].cdev.name = priv->leds[i].name;
> ... which is used with a format string
> | dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
> | "couldn't register LED %s\n",
> | priv->leds[i].cdev.name);
>
> There is no indication that NUL-padding is required but if it is let's
> opt for strscpy_pad.
>
> Considering the above, a suitable replacement is `strscpy` [2] due to
> the fact that it guarantees NUL-termination on the destination buffer
> without unnecessarily NUL-padding.
>
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings [1]
> Link: https://manpages.debian.org/testing/linux-manual-4.8/strscpy.9.en.html [2]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <[email protected]>
> ---
> Note: build-tested only.
> ---
> drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c
> index 3bd55652a706..62ade3f05a87 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int lp3952_get_label(struct device *dev, const char *label, char *dest)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - strncpy(dest, str, LP3952_LABEL_MAX_LEN);
> + strscpy(dest, str, LP3952_LABEL_MAX_LEN);

Given my desire to use sizeof(dest) for these things, I wonder if it'd
be nicer to pass more context here for the compiler as the only user of
this function is the immediately next function. Instead of passing in
"char *dest", it could pass "struct lp3952_led_array *priv", and
suddenly sizeof() would be possible.

But, since it's technically correct as-is:

struct lp3952_ctrl_hdl {
struct led_classdev cdev;
char name[LP3952_LABEL_MAX_LEN];

There's no pressing need to actually do the priv refactor. It's just a
comment on the coding style of the original code. :)

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>

-Kees

> return 0;
> }
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: 2cf0f715623872823a72e451243bbf555d10d032
> change-id: 20230922-strncpy-drivers-leds-leds-lp3952-c-666fcfabeebd
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Justin Stitt <[email protected]>
>

--
Kees Cook

2023-09-28 13:45:49

by Lee Jones

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH] leds: lp3952: replace deprecated strncpy with strscpy

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:27:17 +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> `strncpy` is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings
> [1] and as such we should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string
> interfaces.
>
> We expect `dest` to be NUL-terminated due to its use with dev_err.
>
> lp3952_get_label()'s dest argument is priv->leds[i].name:
> | acpi_ret = lp3952_get_label(&priv->client->dev, led_name_hdl[i],
> | priv->leds[i].name);
> ... which is then assigned to:
> | priv->leds[i].cdev.name = priv->leds[i].name;
> ... which is used with a format string
> | dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
> | "couldn't register LED %s\n",
> | priv->leds[i].cdev.name);
>
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] leds: lp3952: replace deprecated strncpy with strscpy
commit: 821d3ff4b4e2c689576a623348555114e3f2f1c2

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

2023-09-28 13:49:11

by Lee Jones

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: lp3952: replace deprecated strncpy with strscpy

On Sat, 23 Sep 2023, Kees Cook wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 03:27:17PM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> > `strncpy` is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings
> > [1] and as such we should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string
> > interfaces.
> >
> > We expect `dest` to be NUL-terminated due to its use with dev_err.
> >
> > lp3952_get_label()'s dest argument is priv->leds[i].name:
> > | acpi_ret = lp3952_get_label(&priv->client->dev, led_name_hdl[i],
> > | priv->leds[i].name);
> > ... which is then assigned to:
> > | priv->leds[i].cdev.name = priv->leds[i].name;
> > ... which is used with a format string
> > | dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
> > | "couldn't register LED %s\n",
> > | priv->leds[i].cdev.name);
> >
> > There is no indication that NUL-padding is required but if it is let's
> > opt for strscpy_pad.
> >
> > Considering the above, a suitable replacement is `strscpy` [2] due to
> > the fact that it guarantees NUL-termination on the destination buffer
> > without unnecessarily NUL-padding.
> >
> > Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings [1]
> > Link: https://manpages.debian.org/testing/linux-manual-4.8/strscpy.9.en.html [2]
> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Note: build-tested only.
> > ---
> > drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c
> > index 3bd55652a706..62ade3f05a87 100644
> > --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c
> > +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c
> > @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int lp3952_get_label(struct device *dev, const char *label, char *dest)
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - strncpy(dest, str, LP3952_LABEL_MAX_LEN);
> > + strscpy(dest, str, LP3952_LABEL_MAX_LEN);
>
> Given my desire to use sizeof(dest) for these things, I wonder if it'd
> be nicer to pass more context here for the compiler as the only user of
> this function is the immediately next function. Instead of passing in
> "char *dest", it could pass "struct lp3952_led_array *priv", and
> suddenly sizeof() would be possible.
>
> But, since it's technically correct as-is:
>
> struct lp3952_ctrl_hdl {
> struct led_classdev cdev;
> char name[LP3952_LABEL_MAX_LEN];
>
> There's no pressing need to actually do the priv refactor. It's just a
> comment on the coding style of the original code. :)
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>

I've applied this as-is, but please consider Kees' proposal.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]