After commit cff49d58f57e ("spi: Unify error codes by replacing -ENOTSUPP with
-EOPNOTSUPP"), our SPI NOR flashes would stop probing with the following
visible in the kernel log:
[ 2.196300] brcmstb_qspi f0440920.qspi: using bspi-mspi mode
[ 2.210295] spi-nor: probe of spi1.0 failed with error -95
It turns out that the check in spi_mem_exec_op() was changed to check
for -ENOTSUPP (old error code) or -EOPNOTSUPP (new error code), but this
means that for drivers that were converted, the second condition is now
true, and we stop falling through like we used to. Fix the error to
check for neither error being neither -ENOTSUPP *nor* -EOPNOTSUPP.
Fixes: cff49d58f57e ("spi: Unify error codes by replacing -ENOTSUPP with -EOPNOTSUPP")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
Change-Id: I4159811f6c582c4de2143382473d2000b8755872
---
drivers/spi/spi-mem.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
index 2dc8ceb85374..10b5fa003693 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ int spi_mem_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
* read path) and expect the core to use the regular SPI
* interface in other cases.
*/
- if (!ret || ret != -ENOTSUPP || ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
+ if (!ret || (ret != -ENOTSUPP && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP))
return ret;
}
--
2.34.1
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 10:10:49 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> After commit cff49d58f57e ("spi: Unify error codes by replacing -ENOTSUPP with
> -EOPNOTSUPP"), our SPI NOR flashes would stop probing with the following
> visible in the kernel log:
>
> [ 2.196300] brcmstb_qspi f0440920.qspi: using bspi-mspi mode
> [ 2.210295] spi-nor: probe of spi1.0 failed with error -95
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] spi: Fix error code checking in spi_mem_exec_op()
commit: 29895ce18311ddd702973ddb3a6c687db663e0fb
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark