If acp_init() fails, acp pci driver probe should return error.
Add acp_init() function return value check logic.
Fixes: e61b415515d3 ("ASoC: amd: acp: refactor the acp init and de-init sequence")
Signed-off-by: Vijendar Mukunda <[email protected]>
---
changes from v1->v2:
- handle clean up sequence instead of returning error directly
sound/soc/amd/acp/acp-pci.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/acp/acp-pci.c b/sound/soc/amd/acp/acp-pci.c
index 440b91d4f261..5f35b90eab8d 100644
--- a/sound/soc/amd/acp/acp-pci.c
+++ b/sound/soc/amd/acp/acp-pci.c
@@ -115,7 +115,10 @@ static int acp_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pci, const struct pci_device_id *pci_id
goto unregister_dmic_dev;
}
- acp_init(chip);
+ ret = acp_init(chip);
+ if (ret)
+ goto unregister_dmic_dev;
+
res = devm_kcalloc(&pci->dev, num_res, sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!res) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
--
2.34.1
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 11:08:12 +0530, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:
> If acp_init() fails, acp pci driver probe should return error.
> Add acp_init() function return value check logic.
>
>
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: amd: acp: fix for acp_init function error handling
commit: 2c603a4947a1247102ccb008d5eb6f37a4043c98
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark