Core in spi_register_driver() already sets the .owner, so driver
does not need to.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/spi/spi-summary.rst | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/spi/spi-summary.rst b/Documentation/spi/spi-summary.rst
index 546de37d6caf..35e1970a76a9 100644
--- a/Documentation/spi/spi-summary.rst
+++ b/Documentation/spi/spi-summary.rst
@@ -348,7 +348,6 @@ SPI protocol drivers somewhat resemble platform device drivers::
static struct spi_driver CHIP_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "CHIP",
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
.pm = &CHIP_pm_ops,
},
--
2.34.1
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:39:27 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Core in spi_register_driver() already sets the .owner, so driver
> does not need to.
>
>
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] spi: docs: drop driver owner initialization
commit: 5da57c7ca9eabccd89087ed2fdac31a79b1504d8
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark