From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
This cleanup all kprobe events code is not related to the selftest
itself, and it can fail by the reason unrelated to this test.
If the test is successful, the generated events are cleaned up.
And if not, we cannot guarantee that the kprobe events will work
correctly. So, anyway, there is no need to clean it up.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
---
kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
index 4abed36544d0..f94628c15c14 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
@@ -2129,11 +2129,6 @@ static __init int kprobe_trace_self_tests_init(void)
}
end:
- ret = dyn_events_release_all(&trace_kprobe_ops);
- if (ret) {
- pr_warn("error on cleaning up probes.\n");
- warn++;
- }
/*
* Wait for the optimizer work to finish. Otherwise it might fiddle
* with probes in already freed __init text.
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 06:26:53 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
>
> This cleanup all kprobe events code is not related to the selftest
> itself, and it can fail by the reason unrelated to this test.
> If the test is successful, the generated events are cleaned up.
> And if not, we cannot guarantee that the kprobe events will work
> correctly. So, anyway, there is no need to clean it up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
-- Steve