From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
After previous changes, update_trip_temp() only uses its dts argument to
get to the sensors field in the struct intel_soc_dts_sensor_entry object
pointed to by that argument, so pass the value of that field directly to
it instead.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
---
drivers/thermal/intel/intel_soc_dts_iosf.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_soc_dts_iosf.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_soc_dts_iosf.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_soc_dts_iosf.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static int sys_get_trip_temp(struct ther
return 0;
}
-static int update_trip_temp(struct intel_soc_dts_sensor_entry *dts,
+static int update_trip_temp(struct intel_soc_dts_sensors *sensors,
int thres_index, int temp)
{
int status;
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ static int update_trip_temp(struct intel
u32 store_te_out;
u32 te_out;
u32 int_enable_bit = SOC_DTS_TE_APICA_ENABLE;
- struct intel_soc_dts_sensors *sensors = dts->sensors;
if (sensors->intr_type == INTEL_SOC_DTS_INTERRUPT_MSI)
int_enable_bit |= SOC_DTS_TE_MSI_ENABLE;
@@ -162,7 +161,7 @@ static int configure_trip(struct intel_s
{
int ret;
- ret = update_trip_temp(dts, thres_index, temp);
+ ret = update_trip_temp(dts->sensors, thres_index, temp);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -182,7 +181,7 @@ static int sys_set_trip_temp(struct ther
return -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(&sensors->dts_update_lock);
- status = update_trip_temp(dts, trip, temp);
+ status = update_trip_temp(sensors, trip, temp);
mutex_unlock(&sensors->dts_update_lock);
return status;