2022-05-06 03:39:24

by Alaa Mohamed

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH net-next v6 2/2] net: vxlan: Add extack support to vxlan_fdb_delete

This patch adds extack msg support to vxlan_fdb_delete and vxlan_fdb_parse.
extack is used to propagate meaningful error msgs to the user of vxlan
fdb netlink api

Signed-off-by: Alaa Mohamed <[email protected]>
---
changes in V2:
- fix spelling vxlan_fdb_delete
- add missing braces
- edit error message
---
changes in V3:
fix errors reported by checkpatch.pl
---
changes in V4:
- fix errors reported by checkpatch.pl
- edit commit message.
---
changes in V5:
- edit commit message
---
drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
index ad0f2150cfdb..429ce2168971 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
@@ -1129,19 +1129,25 @@ static void vxlan_fdb_dst_destroy(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan, struct vxlan_fdb *f,

static int vxlan_fdb_parse(struct nlattr *tb[], struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
union vxlan_addr *ip, __be16 *port, __be32 *src_vni,
- __be32 *vni, u32 *ifindex, u32 *nhid)
+ __be32 *vni, u32 *ifindex, u32 *nhid,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct net *net = dev_net(vxlan->dev);
int err;

if (tb[NDA_NH_ID] && (tb[NDA_DST] || tb[NDA_VNI] || tb[NDA_IFINDEX] ||
- tb[NDA_PORT]))
- return -EINVAL;
+ tb[NDA_PORT])) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
+ "DST, VNI, ifindex and port are mutually exclusive with NH_ID");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }

if (tb[NDA_DST]) {
err = vxlan_nla_get_addr(ip, tb[NDA_DST]);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Unsupported address family");
return err;
+ }
} else {
union vxlan_addr *remote = &vxlan->default_dst.remote_ip;

@@ -1157,24 +1163,30 @@ static int vxlan_fdb_parse(struct nlattr *tb[], struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
}

if (tb[NDA_PORT]) {
- if (nla_len(tb[NDA_PORT]) != sizeof(__be16))
+ if (nla_len(tb[NDA_PORT]) != sizeof(__be16)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid vxlan port");
return -EINVAL;
+ }
*port = nla_get_be16(tb[NDA_PORT]);
} else {
*port = vxlan->cfg.dst_port;
}

if (tb[NDA_VNI]) {
- if (nla_len(tb[NDA_VNI]) != sizeof(u32))
+ if (nla_len(tb[NDA_VNI]) != sizeof(u32)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid vni");
return -EINVAL;
+ }
*vni = cpu_to_be32(nla_get_u32(tb[NDA_VNI]));
} else {
*vni = vxlan->default_dst.remote_vni;
}

if (tb[NDA_SRC_VNI]) {
- if (nla_len(tb[NDA_SRC_VNI]) != sizeof(u32))
+ if (nla_len(tb[NDA_SRC_VNI]) != sizeof(u32)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid src vni");
return -EINVAL;
+ }
*src_vni = cpu_to_be32(nla_get_u32(tb[NDA_SRC_VNI]));
} else {
*src_vni = vxlan->default_dst.remote_vni;
@@ -1183,12 +1195,16 @@ static int vxlan_fdb_parse(struct nlattr *tb[], struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
if (tb[NDA_IFINDEX]) {
struct net_device *tdev;

- if (nla_len(tb[NDA_IFINDEX]) != sizeof(u32))
+ if (nla_len(tb[NDA_IFINDEX]) != sizeof(u32)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid ifindex");
return -EINVAL;
+ }
*ifindex = nla_get_u32(tb[NDA_IFINDEX]);
tdev = __dev_get_by_index(net, *ifindex);
- if (!tdev)
+ if (!tdev) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Device not found");
return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
+ }
} else {
*ifindex = 0;
}
@@ -1226,7 +1242,7 @@ static int vxlan_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
return -EINVAL;

err = vxlan_fdb_parse(tb, vxlan, &ip, &port, &src_vni, &vni, &ifindex,
- &nhid);
+ &nhid, extack);
if (err)
return err;

@@ -1292,7 +1308,7 @@ static int vxlan_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
int err;

err = vxlan_fdb_parse(tb, vxlan, &ip, &port, &src_vni, &vni, &ifindex,
- &nhid);
+ &nhid, extack);
if (err)
return err;

--
2.36.0



2022-05-09 23:35:08

by Jakub Kicinski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 2/2] net: vxlan: Add extack support to vxlan_fdb_delete

On Thu, 5 May 2022 17:09:58 +0200 Alaa Mohamed wrote:
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
> + "DST, VNI, ifindex and port are mutually exclusive with NH_ID");

This continuation line still does not align with the opening bracket.
Look here if your email client makes it hard to see:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/ac4b6c650b6519cc56baa32ef20415460a5aa8ee.1651762830.git.eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@gmail.com/

Same story in patch 1:

> static int ocelot_port_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
> struct net_device *dev,
> - const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
> + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)

and here:

> static int vxlan_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
> struct net_device *dev,
> - const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
> + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)

2022-05-12 10:47:47

by Alaa Mohamed

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 2/2] net: vxlan: Add extack support to vxlan_fdb_delete


On ١٠‏/٥‏/٢٠٢٢ ٠٠:٤٦, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 5 May 2022 17:09:58 +0200 Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
>> + "DST, VNI, ifindex and port are mutually exclusive with NH_ID");
> This continuation line still does not align with the opening bracket.
> Look here if your email client makes it hard to see:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ac4b6c650b6519cc56baa32ef20415460a5aa8ee.1651762830.git.eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@gmail.com/
>
> Same story in patch 1:
>
>> static int ocelot_port_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>> struct net_device *dev,
>> - const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>> + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> and here:
>
>> static int vxlan_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>> struct net_device *dev,
>> - const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>> + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)


I will fix it, thanks.