From: Ludovic Barre <[email protected]>
This adds a list of supported STM32 SoC bindings.
Signed-off-by: Gwenael Treuveur <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32.txt | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..05762b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+STMicroelectronics STM32 Platforms Device Tree Bindings
+
+Each device tree must specify which STM32 SoC it uses,
+using one of the following compatible strings:
+
+ st,stm32f429
+ st,stm32f469
+ st,stm32f746
+ st,stm32h743
--
2.7.4
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 02:56:34PM +0100, Ludovic Barre wrote:
> From: Ludovic Barre <[email protected]>
>
> This adds a list of supported STM32 SoC bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gwenael Treuveur <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32.txt | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32.txt
Applied, thanks.
Rob
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:03:48PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 02:56:34PM +0100, Ludovic Barre wrote:
> > From: Ludovic Barre <[email protected]>
> >
> > This adds a list of supported STM32 SoC bindings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gwenael Treuveur <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32.txt | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32.txt
>
> Applied, thanks.
Now dropped as this will conflict with your other series. Send this with
the other series or indicate who should apply.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Rob
hi Rob
Today there was no bindings documentation for STM32 SoC
already upstreamed. This patch adds initial list of STM32
existing in kernel.
The next serie adds just new soc and one compatible on STM32 list.
So, I think you could apply this patch.
BR
Ludo
On 12/13/2017 12:17 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:03:48PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 02:56:34PM +0100, Ludovic Barre wrote:
>>> From: Ludovic Barre <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> This adds a list of supported STM32 SoC bindings.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gwenael Treuveur <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32.txt | 9 +++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32.txt
>>
>> Applied, thanks.
>
> Now dropped as this will conflict with your other series. Send this with
> the other series or indicate who should apply.
>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
>
> Rob
>
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Ludovic BARRE <[email protected]> wrote:
> hi Rob
>
> Today there was no bindings documentation for STM32 SoC
> already upstreamed. This patch adds initial list of STM32
> existing in kernel.
> The next serie adds just new soc and one compatible on STM32 list.
Yes, and that series will go thru arm-soc tree so this patch needs to too.
> So, I think you could apply this patch.
If your series is not going into 4.16, then I can take this one.
Rob
On 12/14/2017 04:05 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Ludovic BARRE <[email protected]> wrote:
>> hi Rob
>>
>> Today there was no bindings documentation for STM32 SoC
>> already upstreamed. This patch adds initial list of STM32
>> existing in kernel.
>> The next serie adds just new soc and one compatible on STM32 list.
>
> Yes, and that series will go thru arm-soc tree so this patch needs to too.
You are right, to avoid merge conflict.
I will included this patch in my series
on "ARM: stm32: add initial STM32MPU support"
This patch can be abandoned.
>
>> So, I think you could apply this patch.
>
> If your series is not going into 4.16, then I can take this one.
>
> Rob
>