Since the code explicilty falls back to a smaller allocation when the
large one fails, we shouldn't complain when that happens.
Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <[email protected]>
---
net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c
index eb086a1..7435505 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ nfulnl_alloc_skb(struct net *net, u32 peer_portid, unsigned int inst_size,
* message. WARNING: has to be <= 128k due to slab restrictions */
n = max(inst_size, pkt_size);
- skb = alloc_skb(n, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ skb = alloc_skb(n, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
if (!skb) {
if (n > pkt_size) {
/* try to allocate only as much as we need for current
--
2.9.3
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 02:02:16PM -0700, Calvin Owens wrote:
> Since the code explicilty falls back to a smaller allocation when the
> large one fails, we shouldn't complain when that happens.
Applied, thanks.