Use temperature-sensor@ naming for nodes following standard conventions of device
tree (section 2.2.2 Generic Names recommendation in [1]).
[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/tree/v0.3
Suggested-by: Suman Anna <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi
index bb498be2f0a4..ed42f13e7663 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
clock-names = "gpio";
};
- wkup_vtm0: thermal@42050000 {
+ wkup_vtm0: temperature-sensor@42050000 {
compatible = "ti,am654-vtm";
reg = <0x42050000 0x25c>;
power-domains = <&k3_pds 80 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
--
2.17.1
On 9/1/20 5:30 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Use temperature-sensor@ naming for nodes following standard conventions of device
> tree (section 2.2.2 Generic Names recommendation in [1]).
>
> [1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/tree/v0.3
>
> Suggested-by: Suman Anna <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi
> index bb498be2f0a4..ed42f13e7663 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
> clock-names = "gpio";
> };
>
> - wkup_vtm0: thermal@42050000 {
> + wkup_vtm0: temperature-sensor@42050000 {
There has been a suggestion to use something like thermal-sensor during the
bindings review, but it is better to use this standard node name.
Reviewed-by: Suman Anna <[email protected]>
regards
Suman
> compatible = "ti,am654-vtm";
> reg = <0x42050000 0x25c>;
> power-domains = <&k3_pds 80 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
>
On 11:55-20200902, Suman Anna wrote:
> On 9/1/20 5:30 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > Use temperature-sensor@ naming for nodes following standard conventions of device
> > tree (section 2.2.2 Generic Names recommendation in [1]).
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/tree/v0.3
> >
> > Suggested-by: Suman Anna <[email protected]>
> > Suggested-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi
> > index bb498be2f0a4..ed42f13e7663 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi
> > @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
> > clock-names = "gpio";
> > };
> >
> > - wkup_vtm0: thermal@42050000 {
> > + wkup_vtm0: temperature-sensor@42050000 {
>
> There has been a suggestion to use something like thermal-sensor during the
> bindings review, but it is better to use this standard node name.
Yes - I did notice it as well, and then picked up the recommendation
straight from 0.3 spec itself.
>
> Reviewed-by: Suman Anna <[email protected]>
>
> regards
> Suman
>
> > compatible = "ti,am654-vtm";
> > reg = <0x42050000 0x25c>;
> > power-domains = <&k3_pds 80 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> >
>
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D