2023-08-07 06:57:23

by Guangguan Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 3/6] net/smc: support smc v2.x features validate

Support smc v2.x features validate for smc v2.1.

Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Lu <[email protected]>
---
net/smc/af_smc.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
net/smc/smc_clc.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
net/smc/smc_clc.h | 7 +++++++
3 files changed, 71 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 52279bdc100a..fd58e25beddf 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -1169,6 +1169,7 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma_v2_prepare(struct smc_sock *smc,
struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce =
(struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *)
(((u8 *)clc_v2) + sizeof(*clc_v2));
+ int rc;

if (!ini->first_contact_peer || aclc->hdr.version == SMC_V1)
return 0;
@@ -1191,6 +1192,9 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma_v2_prepare(struct smc_sock *smc,
if (fce->release > SMC_RELEASE)
return SMC_CLC_DECL_VERSMISMAT;
ini->release_ver = fce->release;
+ rc = smc_clc_cli_v2x_features_validate(fce, ini);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;

return 0;
}
@@ -1367,6 +1371,9 @@ static int smc_connect_ism(struct smc_sock *smc,
if (fce->release > SMC_RELEASE)
return SMC_CLC_DECL_VERSMISMAT;
ini->release_ver = fce->release;
+ rc = smc_clc_cli_v2x_features_validate(fce, ini);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
}

rc = smc_v2_determine_accepted_chid(aclc_v2, ini);
@@ -2417,6 +2424,10 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (rc)
goto out_decl;

+ rc = smc_clc_srv_v2x_features_validate(pclc, ini);
+ if (rc)
+ goto out_decl;
+
mutex_lock(&smc_server_lgr_pending);
smc_close_init(new_smc);
smc_rx_init(new_smc);
@@ -2449,6 +2460,13 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work)
goto out_decl;
}

+ rc = smc_clc_v2x_features_confirm_check(cclc, ini);
+ if (rc) {
+ if (!ini->is_smcd)
+ goto out_unlock;
+ goto out_decl;
+ }
+
/* finish worker */
if (!ini->is_smcd) {
rc = smc_listen_rdma_finish(new_smc, cclc,
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_clc.c b/net/smc/smc_clc.c
index ae80c191a834..4f6b69af2b80 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_clc.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_clc.c
@@ -1158,6 +1158,52 @@ int smc_clc_send_accept(struct smc_sock *new_smc, bool srv_first_contact,
return len > 0 ? 0 : len;
}

+int smc_clc_srv_v2x_features_validate(struct smc_clc_msg_proposal *pclc,
+ struct smc_init_info *ini)
+{
+ struct smc_clc_v2_extension *pclc_v2_ext;
+
+ if ((!(ini->smcd_version & SMC_V2) && !(ini->smcr_version & SMC_V2)) ||
+ ini->release_ver < SMC_RELEASE_1)
+ return 0;
+
+ pclc_v2_ext = smc_get_clc_v2_ext(pclc);
+ if (!pclc_v2_ext)
+ return SMC_CLC_DECL_NOV2EXT;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int smc_clc_cli_v2x_features_validate(struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce,
+ struct smc_init_info *ini)
+{
+ if (ini->release_ver < SMC_RELEASE_1)
+ return 0;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int smc_clc_v2x_features_confirm_check(struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm *cclc,
+ struct smc_init_info *ini)
+{
+ struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm_v2 *clc_v2 =
+ (struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm_v2 *)cclc;
+ struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce =
+ smc_get_clc_first_contact_ext(clc_v2, ini->is_smcd);
+
+ if (cclc->hdr.version == SMC_V1 ||
+ !(cclc->hdr.typev2 & SMC_FIRST_CONTACT_MASK))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (ini->release_ver != fce->release)
+ return SMC_CLC_DECL_RELEASEERR;
+
+ if (fce->release < SMC_RELEASE_1)
+ return 0;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
void smc_clc_get_hostname(u8 **host)
{
*host = &smc_hostname[0];
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_clc.h b/net/smc/smc_clc.h
index 6133276a8839..66932bfdc6d0 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_clc.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_clc.h
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
#define SMC_CLC_DECL_NOSEID 0x03030006 /* peer sent no SEID */
#define SMC_CLC_DECL_NOSMCD2DEV 0x03030007 /* no SMC-Dv2 device found */
#define SMC_CLC_DECL_NOUEID 0x03030008 /* peer sent no UEID */
+#define SMC_CLC_DECL_RELEASEERR 0x03030009 /* release version negotiate failed */
#define SMC_CLC_DECL_MODEUNSUPP 0x03040000 /* smc modes do not match (R or D)*/
#define SMC_CLC_DECL_RMBE_EC 0x03050000 /* peer has eyecatcher in RMBE */
#define SMC_CLC_DECL_OPTUNSUPP 0x03060000 /* fastopen sockopt not supported */
@@ -415,6 +416,12 @@ int smc_clc_send_confirm(struct smc_sock *smc, bool clnt_first_contact,
u8 version, u8 *eid, struct smc_init_info *ini);
int smc_clc_send_accept(struct smc_sock *smc, bool srv_first_contact,
u8 version, u8 *negotiated_eid, struct smc_init_info *ini);
+int smc_clc_srv_v2x_features_validate(struct smc_clc_msg_proposal *pclc,
+ struct smc_init_info *ini);
+int smc_clc_cli_v2x_features_validate(struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce,
+ struct smc_init_info *ini);
+int smc_clc_v2x_features_confirm_check(struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm *cclc,
+ struct smc_init_info *ini);
void smc_clc_init(void) __init;
void smc_clc_exit(void);
void smc_clc_get_hostname(u8 **host);
--
2.24.3 (Apple Git-128)



2023-08-09 16:33:05

by Wenjia Zhang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 3/6] net/smc: support smc v2.x features validate



On 07.08.23 08:27, Guangguan Wang wrote:
> Support smc v2.x features validate for smc v2.1.
>
a bit more description?

> Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Lu <[email protected]>
> ---
> net/smc/af_smc.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> net/smc/smc_clc.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/smc/smc_clc.h | 7 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> index 52279bdc100a..fd58e25beddf 100644
> --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> @@ -1169,6 +1169,7 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma_v2_prepare(struct smc_sock *smc,
> struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce =
> (struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *)
> (((u8 *)clc_v2) + sizeof(*clc_v2));
> + int rc;
>
> if (!ini->first_contact_peer || aclc->hdr.version == SMC_V1)
> return 0;
> @@ -1191,6 +1192,9 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma_v2_prepare(struct smc_sock *smc,
> if (fce->release > SMC_RELEASE)
> return SMC_CLC_DECL_VERSMISMAT;
> ini->release_ver = fce->release;
> + rc = smc_clc_cli_v2x_features_validate(fce, ini);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1367,6 +1371,9 @@ static int smc_connect_ism(struct smc_sock *smc,
> if (fce->release > SMC_RELEASE)
> return SMC_CLC_DECL_VERSMISMAT;
> ini->release_ver = fce->release;
> + rc = smc_clc_cli_v2x_features_validate(fce, ini);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> }
>
> rc = smc_v2_determine_accepted_chid(aclc_v2, ini);
> @@ -2417,6 +2424,10 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work)
> if (rc)
> goto out_decl;
>
> + rc = smc_clc_srv_v2x_features_validate(pclc, ini);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out_decl;
> +
> mutex_lock(&smc_server_lgr_pending);
> smc_close_init(new_smc);
> smc_rx_init(new_smc);
> @@ -2449,6 +2460,13 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work)
> goto out_decl;
> }
>
> + rc = smc_clc_v2x_features_confirm_check(cclc, ini);
> + if (rc) {
> + if (!ini->is_smcd)
> + goto out_unlock;
> + goto out_decl;
> + }
> +
> /* finish worker */
> if (!ini->is_smcd) {
> rc = smc_listen_rdma_finish(new_smc, cclc,
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_clc.c b/net/smc/smc_clc.c
> index ae80c191a834..4f6b69af2b80 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_clc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_clc.c
> @@ -1158,6 +1158,52 @@ int smc_clc_send_accept(struct smc_sock *new_smc, bool srv_first_contact,
> return len > 0 ? 0 : len;
> }
>
> +int smc_clc_srv_v2x_features_validate(struct smc_clc_msg_proposal *pclc,
> + struct smc_init_info *ini)
> +{
> + struct smc_clc_v2_extension *pclc_v2_ext;
> +
> + if ((!(ini->smcd_version & SMC_V2) && !(ini->smcr_version & SMC_V2)) ||
> + ini->release_ver < SMC_RELEASE_1)
> + return 0;
> +
> + pclc_v2_ext = smc_get_clc_v2_ext(pclc);
> + if (!pclc_v2_ext)
> + return SMC_CLC_DECL_NOV2EXT;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int smc_clc_cli_v2x_features_validate(struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce,
> + struct smc_init_info *ini)
> +{
> + if (ini->release_ver < SMC_RELEASE_1)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}

Why need the function? Since it returns 0 anyway.
> +
> +int smc_clc_v2x_features_confirm_check(struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm *cclc,
> + struct smc_init_info *ini)
> +{
> + struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm_v2 *clc_v2 =
> + (struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm_v2 *)cclc;
> + struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce =
> + smc_get_clc_first_contact_ext(clc_v2, ini->is_smcd);
> +
> + if (cclc->hdr.version == SMC_V1 ||
> + !(cclc->hdr.typev2 & SMC_FIRST_CONTACT_MASK))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (ini->release_ver != fce->release)
> + return SMC_CLC_DECL_RELEASEERR;
> +
> + if (fce->release < SMC_RELEASE_1)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> void smc_clc_get_hostname(u8 **host)
> {
> *host = &smc_hostname[0];
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_clc.h b/net/smc/smc_clc.h
> index 6133276a8839..66932bfdc6d0 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_clc.h
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_clc.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> #define SMC_CLC_DECL_NOSEID 0x03030006 /* peer sent no SEID */
> #define SMC_CLC_DECL_NOSMCD2DEV 0x03030007 /* no SMC-Dv2 device found */
> #define SMC_CLC_DECL_NOUEID 0x03030008 /* peer sent no UEID */
> +#define SMC_CLC_DECL_RELEASEERR 0x03030009 /* release version negotiate failed */
> #define SMC_CLC_DECL_MODEUNSUPP 0x03040000 /* smc modes do not match (R or D)*/
> #define SMC_CLC_DECL_RMBE_EC 0x03050000 /* peer has eyecatcher in RMBE */
> #define SMC_CLC_DECL_OPTUNSUPP 0x03060000 /* fastopen sockopt not supported */
> @@ -415,6 +416,12 @@ int smc_clc_send_confirm(struct smc_sock *smc, bool clnt_first_contact,
> u8 version, u8 *eid, struct smc_init_info *ini);
> int smc_clc_send_accept(struct smc_sock *smc, bool srv_first_contact,
> u8 version, u8 *negotiated_eid, struct smc_init_info *ini);
> +int smc_clc_srv_v2x_features_validate(struct smc_clc_msg_proposal *pclc,
> + struct smc_init_info *ini);
> +int smc_clc_cli_v2x_features_validate(struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce,
> + struct smc_init_info *ini);
> +int smc_clc_v2x_features_confirm_check(struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm *cclc,
> + struct smc_init_info *ini);
> void smc_clc_init(void) __init;
> void smc_clc_exit(void);
> void smc_clc_get_hostname(u8 **host);

2023-08-16 21:43:00

by Guangguan Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 3/6] net/smc: support smc v2.x features validate



On 2023/8/10 00:03, Wenjia Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 07.08.23 08:27, Guangguan Wang wrote:
>> Support smc v2.x features validate for smc v2.1.
>>
> a bit more description?
>

OK, more descriptions will be added in the next version.

>> Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Tony Lu <[email protected]>