On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 17:22 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi Arnd and Olof,
>
> This is just a resend of previous patch. Since I did not get replies
> from Intel maintainers, I assume this could go via soc tree directly.
I think the to/cc list is missing Dinh, the socfpga maintainer:
Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
I already acked the only patch I could review, i.e.:
dt-bindings: arm: intel,keembay: limit the dtschema to root node
Regards,
Daniele
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>
> Krzysztof Kozlowski (10):
> dt-bindings: arm: intel,keembay: limit the dtschema to root node
> arm64: dts: intel: socfpga: override clocks by label
> arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: move clocks out of soc node
> arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: move timer out of soc node
> arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: remove default status=okay
> arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: move usbphy out of soc node
> arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: use defined for GIC interrupts
> arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: align node names with dtschema
> arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex_socdk: align LED node names with
> dtschema
> arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex_socdk_nand: align LED node names
> with dtschema
>
> .../bindings/arm/intel,keembay.yaml | 2 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi | 222 ++++++++++----
> ----
> .../boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex_socdk.dts | 18 +-
> .../dts/intel/socfpga_agilex_socdk_nand.dts | 18 +-
> .../boot/dts/intel/socfpga_n5x_socdk.dts | 12 +-
> 5 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
>