2001-03-06 17:01:41

by Hao Sun

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: TCP vegas implementation


> From Neal Cardwell ([email protected])
> Tue, 20 Jul 1999 03:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
>
> Hi all,
>
> A new TCP Vegas patch for 2.2.10/2.3.10 is available at:
> http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/cardwell/linux-vegas/

Does anyone know where to get the above TCP vegas implementation code
or a more recent one? The link above is broken and Neal Cardwell is
not there.

TIA. Please CC to me.

-- Hao



2001-03-06 21:18:07

by Mordechai Ovits

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: TCP vegas implementation

linux-vegas:

http://pictures.care2.com/view/2/459681070

Really.

Mordy

On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 12:03:02PM -0500, Hao Sun wrote:
>
> > From Neal Cardwell ([email protected])
> > Tue, 20 Jul 1999 03:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A new TCP Vegas patch for 2.2.10/2.3.10 is available at:
> > http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/cardwell/linux-vegas/
>
> Does anyone know where to get the above TCP vegas implementation code
> or a more recent one? The link above is broken and Neal Cardwell is
> not there.
>
> TIA. Please CC to me.
>
> -- Hao
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

2001-03-06 21:28:48

by Dan Hollis

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: TCP vegas implementation

On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Mordechai Ovits wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 12:03:02PM -0500, Hao Sun wrote:
> > > From Neal Cardwell ([email protected])
> > > Tue, 20 Jul 1999 03:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
> > > A new TCP Vegas patch for 2.2.10/2.3.10 is available at:
> > > http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/cardwell/linux-vegas/
> > Does anyone know where to get the above TCP vegas implementation code
> > or a more recent one? The link above is broken and Neal Cardwell is
> > not there.

I had big performance problems with tcp-vegas on highly assymetric WAN
connections (eg 8m/640k adsl). Normal tcp worked fine.

-Dan