Hi,
I'm having problems getting my 2.4.2 kernel to synchronise properly. For
some reason, NTP is insisting on making time offset adjustments.
Is anyone else using NTP with 2.4.2, and if so, are you synchronising
properly?
(I'm using the RH7.0 version of ntp-4.0.99j here)
--
Russell King ([email protected]) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
Russell King wrote:
> Is anyone else using NTP with 2.4.2, and if so, are you synchronising
> properly?
Works for me. (RH7, ntp-4.0.99j-7, Kernel 2.4.2-ac23 - but worked with
plain 2.4.2, too)
Holger
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 04:23:45PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> I'm having problems getting my 2.4.2 kernel to synchronise properly. For
> some reason, NTP is insisting on making time offset adjustments.
It isn't a GMT vs localtime issue, I presume?
>
> Is anyone else using NTP with 2.4.2, and if so, are you synchronising
> properly?
Yes, working fine for me.
> (I'm using the RH7.0 version of ntp-4.0.99j here)
Suse 6.3, xntp-4.0.98d-0, mostly vanilla kernel 2.4.2
--
Erik Hensema ([email protected])
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 08:22:45PM +0200, Erik Hensema wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 04:23:45PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > I'm having problems getting my 2.4.2 kernel to synchronise properly. For
> > some reason, NTP is insisting on making time offset adjustments.
>
> It isn't a GMT vs localtime issue, I presume?
No, I solved the problem - the 100Hz interrupt wasn't close enough to 100Hz
to allow NTP to do its job.
--
Russell King ([email protected]) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
Hi!
> I'm having problems getting my 2.4.2 kernel to synchronise properly. For
> some reason, NTP is insisting on making time offset adjustments.
Are you using fbcon? If so, and if it goes away after starting X, then it is
the "fbcon kills interrupt latency" problem.
Pavel
--
Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.