Updated my glibc; -ac7 now still won't compile with
gcc-3.0-pre-2001-04-08.
I will test with today's or tomorrow's gcc-snapshot when I'll get the
time but
I'm at work at the moment and this does cope more than "just the
kernel".
But we _do need_ a working current-kernel.
Second: ASUS A7PRO, Duron-700 - any problems reported at the moment?
-mirabilos
--
))) LICENSE FOR ABOVE MESSAGE BODY: (((
YOU MUST NOT READ ABOVE MESSAGE BODY IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THESE
TERMS. BY READING ABOVE MESSAGE BODY YOU AUTOMATICALLY DO AGREE
TO THE FOLLOWING TERMS:
The mail is protected by copyright law. It MUST NOT be used
otherwise than specified by the terms and conditions at:
http://members.tripod.de/mirabilos/license.mip
This mail is, if not explicitly specified differently, ONLY licensed
by these terms. THIS CAN NOT BE OVERRIDDEN BY ANY "TERMS OF SERVICE"
OF ANY S.PROVIDER THE MAIL GOES THROUGH, EVEN _NOT_ IF I SIGNED THEM!
--
(Sorry for the bandwidth, but some ToS force me to.)
EA F0 FF 00 F0 #$@%CARRIER LOST
> gcc-3.0-pre-2001-04-08.
> I will test with today's or tomorrow's gcc-snapshot when I'll get the
> time but
> I'm at work at the moment and this does cope more than "just the
> kernel".
> But we _do need_ a working current-kernel.
Use gcc 2.95/2.96
"Alan Cox wrote:"
> > But we _do need_ a working current-kernel.
>
> Use gcc 2.95/2.96
Is 2.91.66 already obsolete ?
Documentation/Changes does not suggest this ...
Andrzej
--
=======================================================================
Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz [email protected]
tel. (0-58) 347 14 61
Wydz.Fizyki Technicznej i Matematyki Stosowanej Politechniki Gdanskiej
> "Alan Cox wrote:"
> > > But we _do need_ a working current-kernel.
> >
> > Use gcc 2.95/2.96
>
> Is 2.91.66 already obsolete ?
> Documentation/Changes does not suggest this ...
Its 'temporarily not working'. The rwsem stuff needs cleaning up or ifdeffing
a bit to handle egcs thats all