2001-07-07 01:14:33

by linuxx

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Hi all, a strange full lock in SMP-kernel 2.4.6 and 2.4.5

Well Full lock in 2.4.5 and .6 when in a SMP intel p III 500mhz when i try to print any file in a epson 760 usb and parport
printer.
I put in antecedents . With 2.4.3 and before the printer via usb or partport print ok . In 2.4.5-6 when i try to send
anything to /dev/usb/lp0 like cat a.txt > /dev/usb/lp0 the system fail or if i do in lpr same . I have no problem if i use parport whit the sames kernels .I have all right configured. With the same computer in other distribution .Same kernel = same lock .Of course the LPRng and gcc are
all compiled in this machine and work right for months , both stables versions.I put the only trace y can get for the lock.
I hope help something for any other thing i not subscribed to kernel list so i like to know any answer you can give. THANKS

CPU: 0
EIP: 0010:[<d084acd1>]
EFLAGS: 00000086
eax: cd747600 ebx: cd1d42a0 ecx: 00000001 edx: cd747600
esi: cd1d41fc edi: 00000000 ebp: 00000004 esp: cd077f34
ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss:0018
Process cat (pid: 378, stackpage=cd077000)
Stack: 0000017a 00000000 00000005 00000000 00000206 cd1d41a0 cd8f0000 00000000
00000004 d0837aac cd1d41fc d084e411 cd1d41fc 00000000 cdec8c60 ffffffea
00000000 00000004 c013a1c6 cdec8c60 0804c860 00000004 cdec8c80 00000025

Call Trace: [<013a1c6>] [<c0106ea7>]
Code: 80 7b 24 00 f3 90 7e f8 e9 e0 d0 ff ff 80 bf 80 00 00 00 00
console shuts up ...
<unfinished ...>
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++



--

Lee y algo aprender?s:

#----------------------------------------------------------------------
I used to think romantic love was a neurosis shared by two, a supreme
foolishness. I no longer thought that. There's nothing foolish in
loving anyone. Thinking you'll be loved in return is what's foolish.
-- Rita Mae Brown
#----------------------------------------------------------------------


Luis Toro Teijeiro THANKS FOR YOUR TIME.

()
(o_|||
A?O 3021 del //\ | demoniaco.
<<-V_/_|

ICQ : 42466380
pasate por http://www.gulic.org y veras Canarias y los linuxeros
http://jaya.dyndns.org ------pagina personal
Firma gnupg disponible en https://jaya.dyndns.org/linux/GNUPG/
GnupgFingerprint: 8F06 3E9A F610 89BF 0B09 3DEB 0C7E 9AE1 6CE0 B251
Windows Where do you want to go today?
MacOS Where do you want to be tomorrow?
Linux Are you coming, or what?




Attachments:
(No filename) (2.45 kB)
(No filename) (232.00 B)
Download all attachments

2001-07-07 03:53:38

by Pete Toscano

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Hi all, a strange full lock in SMP-kernel 2.4.6 and 2.4.5

I think I've seen this same problem, at least with regards to USB
printing. Yesterday, I traced the problem down to a patch to usb-uhci.c
in the transition from 2.4.3 to 2.4.4. The problem persists today. A
work around for this problem is to use the alternate UHCI driver
(uhci.o).

What motherboard and chipset are you using. I use the Tyan Tiger 133
motherboard with the VIA Apollo Pro 133a chipset. Someone else who I
heard from uses another VIA-based chipset (I think, he never replied to
my question). Maybe this is a VIA-related problem, like the APIC
problem is. (Do you use "noapic" when you boot? He and I both have SMP
systems too....)

I posted something on the linux-usb list yesterday about this problem
and with all the info I was able to track down, but I have yet to see
any response. I've taken this as far as I can by myself. I don't know
enough about kernel programming or about USB to check the code in
usb-uhci.c, but I'm more than happy to help by providing information
and/or testing potential patches/fixes.

pete

On Sat, 07 Jul 2001, linuxx wrote:

> Well Full lock in 2.4.5 and .6 when in a SMP intel p III 500mhz when i try to print any file in a epson 760 usb and parport
> printer.
> I put in antecedents . With 2.4.3 and before the printer via usb or partport print ok . In 2.4.5-6 when i try to send
> anything to /dev/usb/lp0 like cat a.txt > /dev/usb/lp0 the system fail or if i do in lpr same . I have no problem if i use parport whit the sames kernels .I have all right configured. With the same computer in other distribution .Same kernel = same lock .Of course the LPRng and gcc are
> all compiled in this machine and work right for months , both stables versions.I put the only trace y can get for the lock.
> I hope help something for any other thing i not subscribed to kernel list so i like to know any answer you can give. THANKS
>
> CPU: 0
> EIP: 0010:[<d084acd1>]
> EFLAGS: 00000086
> eax: cd747600 ebx: cd1d42a0 ecx: 00000001 edx: cd747600
> esi: cd1d41fc edi: 00000000 ebp: 00000004 esp: cd077f34
> ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss:0018
> Process cat (pid: 378, stackpage=cd077000)
> Stack: 0000017a 00000000 00000005 00000000 00000206 cd1d41a0 cd8f0000 00000000
> 00000004 d0837aac cd1d41fc d084e411 cd1d41fc 00000000 cdec8c60 ffffffea
> 00000000 00000004 c013a1c6 cdec8c60 0804c860 00000004 cdec8c80 00000025
>
> Call Trace: [<013a1c6>] [<c0106ea7>]
> Code: 80 7b 24 00 f3 90 7e f8 e9 e0 d0 ff ff 80 bf 80 00 00 00 00
> console shuts up ...
> <unfinished ...>
> +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++

2001-07-07 20:34:25

by Pete Toscano

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Hi all, a strange full lock in SMP-kernel 2.4.6 and 2.4.5

Just to follow up to myself, after futher testing, it looks like it's an
SMP-related problem. I'm not yet sure if it's an SMP-Via chipset
problem or just an SMP problem. I've heard from two people with this
same problem. I think one of them has a Via chipset and I'm not sure
about the other one.

Can anybody look into this or give me a good brain dump on how I can fix
it?

Thanks,
pete

On Fri, 06 Jul 2001, Pete Toscano wrote:

> I think I've seen this same problem, at least with regards to USB
> printing. Yesterday, I traced the problem down to a patch to usb-uhci.c
> in the transition from 2.4.3 to 2.4.4. The problem persists today. A
> work around for this problem is to use the alternate UHCI driver
> (uhci.o).
>
> What motherboard and chipset are you using. I use the Tyan Tiger 133
> motherboard with the VIA Apollo Pro 133a chipset. Someone else who I
> heard from uses another VIA-based chipset (I think, he never replied to
> my question). Maybe this is a VIA-related problem, like the APIC
> problem is. (Do you use "noapic" when you boot? He and I both have SMP
> systems too....)
>
> I posted something on the linux-usb list yesterday about this problem
> and with all the info I was able to track down, but I have yet to see
> any response. I've taken this as far as I can by myself. I don't know
> enough about kernel programming or about USB to check the code in
> usb-uhci.c, but I'm more than happy to help by providing information
> and/or testing potential patches/fixes.
>
> pete