2001-10-07 01:29:20

by Bob McElrath

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Linux 2.4.11-pre4, extremely long umount times

I'm running 2.4.11-pre4 with the ext3 patch and Andrew Morton's low-latency
patch on an alpha LX164.

umount times are extremely long (> 30 minutes) for both ext2 and ext3
filesystems, though they eventually succeed.

Is this a known problem?

Cheers,
-- Bob

Bob McElrath ([email protected])
Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Department of Physics


Attachments:
(No filename) (358.00 B)
(No filename) (240.00 B)
Download all attachments

2001-10-07 03:25:32

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.11-pre4, extremely long umount times

Bob McElrath wrote:
>
> I'm running 2.4.11-pre4 with the ext3 patch and Andrew Morton's low-latency
> patch on an alpha LX164.
>
> umount times are extremely long (> 30 minutes) for both ext2 and ext3
> filesystems, though they eventually succeed.
>
> Is this a known problem?
>

Nope. It's possible to get swapoff durations of many minutes,
but I don't think similar problems with unmount have been reported.
Is there any disk activity? ps and top output? Any theories?

BTW: I'm faintly surprised to hear that ext3 actually works in
2.4.11-pre4. Quite a lot of things with which ext3 has an intimate
relationship were changed....

2001-10-07 04:02:28

by Bob McElrath

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.11-pre4, extremely long umount times

Andrew Morton [[email protected]] wrote:
> Bob McElrath wrote:
> >
> > I'm running 2.4.11-pre4 with the ext3 patch and Andrew Morton's low-latency
> > patch on an alpha LX164.
> >
> > umount times are extremely long (> 30 minutes) for both ext2 and ext3
> > filesystems, though they eventually succeed.
> >
> > Is this a known problem?
> >
>
> Nope. It's possible to get swapoff durations of many minutes,
> but I don't think similar problems with unmount have been reported.
> Is there any disk activity? ps and top output? Any theories?

umount is using 100% of the cpu. I've been through four or five mount/umounts
and all of them hung like this.

> BTW: I'm faintly surprised to hear that ext3 actually works in
> 2.4.11-pre4. Quite a lot of things with which ext3 has an intimate
> relationship were changed....

I had to do some non-trival patch merging to fs/buffer.c and fs/super.c. It's
possible I did something wrong. Attached are the diffs between 2.4.11-pre4 for
those two files.

There's some low-latency business in buffer.c too. This may be a case of
overpatchitis.

Aside from the umount though, all the filesystems (ext2, ext3, and reiserfs)
seem to work fine. Machine has been up for about a day now.

Cheers,
-- Bob

Bob McElrath ([email protected])
Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Department of Physics


Attachments:
(No filename) (0.00 B)
(No filename) (240.00 B)
Download all attachments