do you guys need knifs, guns or tanks. instead of bicker you should put
your knowlage together. if your willing to do so, you might be able to
write a vm that is comparable to vm of a freebsd.
sorry for that message
I agree, with all the time and bandwidth this useless flame war has
consumed much merging and coding could have taken place. I never
understood why we can't find some common gound in the two VM's and have
two heads on this issue instead of just one.
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Christian Widmer wrote:
> do you guys need knifs, guns or tanks. instead of bicker you should put
> your knowlage together. if your willing to do so, you might be able to
> write a vm that is comparable to vm of a freebsd.
>
> sorry for that message
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
> your knowlage together. if your willing to do so, you might be able to
> write a vm that is comparable to vm of a freebsd.
Rik's rmap11 seems to be giving me basically identical behaviour to FreeBSD.
Now there is sort of a reason for that - Rik spent a lot of time looking at
the FreeBSD VM and talking with FreeBSD VM wizards.
On Thursday 17 January 2002 08:35 am, Alan Cox wrote:
> > your knowlage together. if your willing to do so, you might be able to
> > write a vm that is comparable to vm of a freebsd.
>
> Rik's rmap11 seems to be giving me basically identical behaviour to
> FreeBSD. Now there is sort of a reason for that - Rik spent a lot of time
> looking at the FreeBSD VM and talking with FreeBSD VM wizards.
What are these arguments achieving? I love the fact everyone is an individual
as it does create innovation in its own right, but its also causing waste too
when it gets out of hand. But its probably always been like that to some
extent here. VM issue seems to be out of hand (I know its complex).
What features do each of the VM's possess? Maybe it should be listed out with
negatives and positives so even someone who really is not a programmer can
understand it.
Why are we up to 2.4.17 already? Is it mainly this VM issue?
Matt
PS Alan, good luck to Wales in the upcoming six nations.
> What features do each of the VM's possess? Maybe it should be listed out with
> negatives and positives so even someone who really is not a programmer can
> understand it.
>
> Why are we up to 2.4.17 already? Is it mainly this VM issue?
Most update material is driver updates and small fixes. Contrary to the MS
world view regular releases of the base kernel are a good thing. Vendors
will figure out how to do less frequent releases for customers care
The VM change does probably account for 4 or 5 patchlevels.
> PS Alan, good luck to Wales in the upcoming six nations.
I have a horrible feeling they are going to need a lot of it 8)
Alan
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 04:59:29PM +0100, Christian Widmer wrote:
> do you guys need knifs, guns or tanks. instead of bicker you should put
> your knowlage together. if your willing to do so, you might be able to
> write a vm that is comparable to vm of a freebsd.
a little careful googling will reveal that rik van riel has in fact
spent much time conversing with matt dillon (freebsd vm guru) about such
things...
http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-mm/2000-05/msg00419.html
there is a lot more to these vm "wars" than the "wars" on lk. behind
the chatter there is research going on that the vm guys should probably
get much more recognition for.
j.
--
R N G G "Well, there it goes again... And we just sit
I G G G here without opposable thumbs." -- gary larson