On 31-May 02:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
[snip]
> So 0.51 version is here:
> http://home.elka.pw.edu.pl/~bzolnier/atapci/atapci-0.51.tar.bz2
>
> changelog:
> - make it kernel version independent
> - add '-s' strip flag to CFLAGS
> - minor cosmetics by Roberto Nibali
>
> --
> bkz
Just a nit, but wouldn't the name "lsata" fit in better with "lspci" and
"lsisa"?
Thomas
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Thomas Zimmerman wrote:
> On 31-May 02:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> [snip]
> > So 0.51 version is here:
> > http://home.elka.pw.edu.pl/~bzolnier/atapci/atapci-0.51.tar.bz2
> >
> > changelog:
> > - make it kernel version independent
> > - add '-s' strip flag to CFLAGS
> > - minor cosmetics by Roberto Nibali
> >
> > --
> > bkz
>
> Just a nit, but wouldn't the name "lsata" fit in better with "lspci" and
> "lsisa"?
>
> Thomas
>
No, it is only for PCI chipsets.
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 06:21:47PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> On Fri, 31 May 2002, Thomas Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > On 31-May 02:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > So 0.51 version is here:
> > > http://home.elka.pw.edu.pl/~bzolnier/atapci/atapci-0.51.tar.bz2
> > >
> > > changelog:
> > > - make it kernel version independent
> > > - add '-s' strip flag to CFLAGS
> > > - minor cosmetics by Roberto Nibali
> > >
> > > --
> > > bkz
> >
> > Just a nit, but wouldn't the name "lsata" fit in better with "lspci" and
> > "lsisa"?
> >
> > Thomas
> >
>
> No, it is only for PCI chipsets.
I think he meant to follow the naming convention set by lspci and lsisa.
What do you think now?
At 03:55 06/06/02, Mike Fedyk wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 06:21:47PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 31 May 2002, Thomas Zimmerman wrote:
> >
> > > On 31-May 02:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > > > So 0.51 version is here:
> > > > http://home.elka.pw.edu.pl/~bzolnier/atapci/atapci-0.51.tar.bz2
> > > >
> > > > changelog:
> > > > - make it kernel version independent
> > > > - add '-s' strip flag to CFLAGS
> > > > - minor cosmetics by Roberto Nibali
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > bkz
> > >
> > > Just a nit, but wouldn't the name "lsata" fit in better with "lspci" and
> > > "lsisa"?
> > >
> > > Thomas
> > >
> >
> > No, it is only for PCI chipsets.
>
>I think he meant to follow the naming convention set by lspci and lsisa.
>What do you think now?
Well the comment that it only applies to pci chipsets still applies. A
compromise would be lsatapci I guess...
Anton
--
"I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cantab.net> (replace at with @)
Linux NTFS Maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.openprojects.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> At 03:55 06/06/02, Mike Fedyk wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 06:21:47PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, 31 May 2002, Thomas Zimmerman wrote:
>> >
>> > > On 31-May 02:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> > > [snip]
>> > > > So 0.51 version is here:
>> > > > http://home.elka.pw.edu.pl/~bzolnier/atapci/atapci-0.51.tar.bz2
>> > > >
>> > > > changelog:
>> > > > - make it kernel version independent
>> > > > - add '-s' strip flag to CFLAGS
>> > > > - minor cosmetics by Roberto Nibali
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > bkz
>> > >
>> > > Just a nit, but wouldn't the name "lsata" fit in better with
>> "lspci" and
>> > > "lsisa"?
>> > >
>> > > Thomas
>> > >
>> >
>> > No, it is only for PCI chipsets.
>>
>> I think he meant to follow the naming convention set by lspci and lsisa.
>> What do you think now?
>
>
> Well the comment that it only applies to pci chipsets still applies. A
> compromise would be lsatapci I guess...
Well the best thing would be to integrate it with hdparm and ide-smart anyway...