I fired up 2519 as a test, same resource collision problem.
Tony
----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
Date: 03 Jun 2002 02:13:45 +0100
To: Vojtech Pavlik <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: INTEL 845G Chipset IDE Quandry
> On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 22:30, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 09:36:35PM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> > > Anthony Spinillo wrote:
> > > > Back to my original problem, will there be a fix before 2010? ;)
> > >
> > > Well since you have already tyred yourself to poke at it.
> > > Well please just go ahead and atd an entry to the table
> > > at the end of piix.c which encompasses the device.
> > > Do it by copying over the next familiar one and I would
> > > be really geald if you could just test whatever this
> > > worked. If yes well please send me just the patch and
> > > I will include it.
> >
> > Note it works with 2.5 already. We have the device there.
>
> If you look at why it fails it fails not because it isnt in the table
> but because the PCI device has not been allocated resources properly by
> the BIOS
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
--
Get your free email from http://www.linuxmail.org
Powered by Outblaze
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 09:04:12AM +0800, Anthony Spinillo wrote:
> I fired up 2519 as a test, same resource collision problem.
In that case, probably only a BIOS upgrade (if there is one available)
can help.
>
> Tony
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
> Date: 03 Jun 2002 02:13:45 +0100
> To: Vojtech Pavlik <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: INTEL 845G Chipset IDE Quandry
>
>
> > On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 22:30, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 09:36:35PM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> > > > Anthony Spinillo wrote:
> > > > > Back to my original problem, will there be a fix before 2010? ;)
> > > >
> > > > Well since you have already tyred yourself to poke at it.
> > > > Well please just go ahead and atd an entry to the table
> > > > at the end of piix.c which encompasses the device.
> > > > Do it by copying over the next familiar one and I would
> > > > be really geald if you could just test whatever this
> > > > worked. If yes well please send me just the patch and
> > > > I will include it.
> > >
> > > Note it works with 2.5 already. We have the device there.
> >
> > If you look at why it fails it fails not because it isnt in the table
> > but because the PCI device has not been allocated resources properly by
> > the BIOS
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to [email protected]
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> >
>
> --
> Get your free email from http://www.linuxmail.org
>
>
> Powered by Outblaze
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs