On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 05:52:29PM +0400, Andrey Panin wrote:
> > > "Latest" (2.4.17) visws patch which i'm planning to convert for 2.5, uses
> > > function MP_processor_info() from generic mpparse.c. May be it makes sence
> > > to move to some generic file ?
> > Is that the one from the visws sourceforge project ?
> Yes it is.
Ah good. *cross item off TODO list*
Dave
--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
On Птн, Июн 14, 2002 at 04:16:27 +0200, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 05:52:29PM +0400, Andrey Panin wrote:
>
> > > > "Latest" (2.4.17) visws patch which i'm planning to convert for 25, uses
> > > > function MP_processor_info() from generic mpparse.c. May be it makes sence
> > > > to move to some generic file ?
> > > Is that the one from the visws sourceforge project ?
> > Yes it is.
>
> Ah good. *cross item off TODO list*
Does it make sense to submit it right now before i386 arch split will
be completed ?
--
Andrey Panin | Embedded systems software engineer
[email protected] | PGP key: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 05:36:32PM +0400, Andrey Panin wrote:
> > > > > "Latest" (2.4.17) visws patch which i'm planning to convert for 25, uses
> > > > > function MP_processor_info() from generic mpparse.c. May be it makes sence
> > > > > to move to some generic file ?
> > > > Is that the one from the visws sourceforge project ?
> > > Yes it is.
> >
> > Ah good. *cross item off TODO list*
>
> Does it make sense to submit it right now before i386 arch split will
> be completed ?
I took a quick look over James' current patch last night. In it's
current state, I think it's quite large already, and as it touches
so many areas, I'm wondering if it's possible to split it up into
chunks and merge it gradually.
merging visws now would mean a large part of James' current work
would be out of sync.
Dave
--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs