2002-06-19 15:15:43

by Chris Friesen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: recommended method for hardware to report events to userspace?


I'm doing some work on a SONET PHY and I was wondering what the recommended
method is for asynchronously reporting events to userspace.

I have some non-critical events (correctable ecc errors, etc) that I poll every
once in a while, but there are some critical events (loss of signal, for
instance) that I want to report immediately.

What is the usual way of doing this? I see three possibilities: 1) the
userspace app could register its pid with the driver using ioctl() and on a
fault the interrupt handler in the driver could fire off a signal to the
registered pids to alert them that something happened, at which point they do
another ioctl() to find out exactly what it was, 2) use netlink to provide a
socket-based notification of what happened, 3) provide a file descriptor that
becomes readable when an event happens.

What's the Right Thing to do here?


Thanks,
Chris

--
Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10
Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557
3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986
Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: [email protected]


2002-06-19 16:16:05

by Tommy Reynolds

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: recommended method for hardware to report events to userspace?

Uttered "Chris Friesen" <[email protected]>, spoke thus:

> I'm doing some work on a SONET PHY and I was wondering what the recommended
> method is for asynchronously reporting events to userspace.
>
> I have some non-critical events (correctable ecc errors, etc) that I poll
> every once in a while, but there are some critical events (loss of signal, for
> instance) that I want to report immediately.
>
> What is the usual way of doing this? I see three possibilities: 1) the
> userspace app could register its pid with the driver using ioctl() and on a
> fault the interrupt handler in the driver could fire off a signal to the
> registered pids to alert them that something happened, at which point they do
> another ioctl() to find out exactly what it was, 2) use netlink to provide a
> socket-based notification of what happened, 3) provide a file descriptor that
> becomes readable when an event happens.
>
> What's the Right Thing to do here?

There's no One Right Way to do this. Here's my suggested feature
hierarchy:

1) Provide a "/proc" file system entry so humans can easily see your
driver's status. It's easy to make a simple read-only "/proc" file.

2) Implement a "poll" method in your device driver that simply blocks
until one of your anomalous events occurs. Applications can then do
a standard select(2) system call to detect these events. Select(2)
is quite efficient. After the select(2) returns, then a simple
read(2) could get the data.

3) Implement a "mmap" method in your device driver so that
applications could just map in a status buffer.

4) You could use signals, but these take more handshaking
infrastructure via ioctl's between the driver and applications than
do these other suggestions.