On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 04:07:00PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> Your mail to 'Linux-kernel' with the subject
> [BUG] floppy requests
> Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
> The reason it is being held:
> Posting to a restricted list by sender requires approval
> Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
> notification of the moderator's decision.
As [email protected] neither restricted nor administered from
broadcom.com last I checked perhaps someone should look into this.
Matti, you've addressed some list-related issues in the past, if you've
got some way of knowing how to deal with this, I'd be much obliged.
Thanks,
Bill
Damn, why all weird questions creep up when I take couple days off..
(there is this sort of summer-solstice carneval we finns do...)
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 04:17:54PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 04:07:00PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> > Your mail to 'Linux-kernel' with the subject
> > [BUG] floppy requests
> > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
> > The reason it is being held:
> > Posting to a restricted list by sender requires approval
> > Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
> > notification of the moderator's decision.
>
> As [email protected] neither restricted nor administered from
> broadcom.com last I checked perhaps someone should look into this.
I don't see directly any linux-kernel@**broadcom.com address
at the list. (We do have 64 of "^linux-kernel@" matching addresses
in the linux-kernel list, though.)
There are couple addresses at broadcom.com, but those addresses have
a feeling of being individual people.
> Matti, you've addressed some list-related issues in the past, if you've
> got some way of knowing how to deal with this, I'd be much obliged.
Well, I might get similar bounce for this reply, and I could try to
decode it a bit. Nevertheless, I don't suggest holding your breath,
asphyxiation does set in a bit too fast for my abilities to debug
these things in the usual case ;-)
> Thanks,
> Bill
/Matti Aarnio
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 10:57:34PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> Well, I might get similar bounce for this reply, and I could try to
> decode it a bit. Nevertheless, I don't suggest holding your breath,
> asphyxiation does set in a bit too fast for my abilities to debug
> these things in the usual case ;-)
> /Matti Aarnio
No trouble at all; procmail handles this well enough for me to ignore it
personally. I have a notion though that you could help, and see that you
are doing so.
Thanks,
Bill