On smaller machines, bootstrapping proceeds far enough to see races
in kmaps near generic_file_read() etc. This is precisely the
in_interrupt() BUG(), but it's quite clear this is happening in
process context. Not even the smaller machines can survive this.
That is, it is impossible to run at all without it (or an equivalent).
Robert, please apply.
Thanks,
Bill
===== include/asm-i386/hardirq.h 1.7 vs edited =====
--- 1.7/include/asm-i386/hardirq.h Mon May 20 10:51:17 2002
+++ edited/include/asm-i386/hardirq.h Thu Jul 11 19:51:02 2002
@@ -22,8 +22,24 @@
* Are we in an interrupt context? Either doing bottom half
* or hardware interrupt processing?
*/
-#define in_interrupt() ({ int __cpu = smp_processor_id(); \
- (local_irq_count(__cpu) + local_bh_count(__cpu) != 0); })
+static inline int in_interrupt(void)
+{
+ int total_count, retval, cpu;
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+ total_count = local_irq_count(cpu) + local_bh_count(cpu);
+
+ if (total_count)
+ retval = 1;
+ else
+ retval = 0;
+
+ preempt_disable();
+
+ return retval;
+}
#define in_irq() (local_irq_count(smp_processor_id()) != 0)
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 03:40:03PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On smaller machines, bootstrapping proceeds far enough to see races
> in kmaps near generic_file_read() etc. This is precisely the
> in_interrupt() BUG(), but it's quite clear this is happening in
> process context. Not even the smaller machines can survive this.
> That is, it is impossible to run at all without it (or an equivalent).
> Robert, please apply.
Argh, I forgot to credit Rusty Russell (and possibly also Paul Mackerras)
with originally discovering & fixing this.
Cheers,
Bill
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Argh, I forgot to credit Rusty Russell (and possibly also Paul Mackerras)
> with originally discovering & fixing this.
While we're on it, thanks from me, too.
Regards,
Thunder
--
(Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode)
------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$
N--- o? K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G
e++++ h* r--- y-
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> ===== include/asm-i386/hardirq.h 1.7 vs edited =====
> + preempt_disable();
> +
> + return retval;
> +}
Not sure how it survived running. That should be a preempt_enable() on
the way out. Maybe I should have used the get_cpu()/put_cpu() stuff.
Amended patch follows.
Cheers,
Bill
===== include/asm-i386/hardirq.h 1.7 vs edited =====
--- 1.7/include/asm-i386/hardirq.h Mon May 20 10:51:17 2002
+++ edited/include/asm-i386/hardirq.h Thu Jul 11 19:51:02 2002
@@ -22,8 +22,24 @@
* Are we in an interrupt context? Either doing bottom half
* or hardware interrupt processing?
*/
-#define in_interrupt() ({ int __cpu = smp_processor_id(); \
- (local_irq_count(__cpu) + local_bh_count(__cpu) != 0); })
+static inline int in_interrupt(void)
+{
+ int total_count, retval, cpu;
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+ total_count = local_irq_count(cpu) + local_bh_count(cpu);
+
+ if (total_count)
+ retval = 1;
+ else
+ retval = 0;
+
+ preempt_enable();
+
+ return retval;
+}
#define in_irq() (local_irq_count(smp_processor_id()) != 0)