2002-09-11 16:59:23

by Hans Reiser

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [BK] ReiserFS file write bug fix for 2.4

Well, at least getting the new file write code into pre6 found this bug
for us.... please apply.


Attachments:
reiserfs_file_write bugfix (2.49 kB)

2002-09-11 17:18:36

by Dieter Nützel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] [BK] ReiserFS file write bug fix for 2.4

On Wednesday 11 September 2002 19:04, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Well, at least getting the new file write code into pre6 found this bug
> for us.... please apply.

What is the "right" way to get the new block allocation going?
The mount option (-o alloc=prealloc min=4:preallocsize=9) only or better a
"reformat"?

Thanks,
Dieter
--
Dieter N?tzel
Graduate Student, Computer Science

University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
@home: Dieter.Nuetzel at hamburg.de (replace at with @)

2002-09-11 17:48:24

by Oleg Drokin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] [BK] ReiserFS file write bug fix for 2.4

Hello!

On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:34:11PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 September 2002 19:04, Hans Reiser wrote:
> > Well, at least getting the new file write code into pre6 found this bug
> > for us.... please apply.
> What is the "right" way to get the new block allocation going?

use 2.4.19-pre2+ and it is in there ;)

> The mount option (-o alloc=prealloc min=4:preallocsize=9) only or better a
> "reformat"?

Those mount options are no longer needed starting from 2.4.20-pre6.
They are default. Reformat is not needed, but all the blocks allocated by old
allocator will remain at their old places of course.

Bye,
Oleg

2002-09-11 19:21:31

by Dieter Nützel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] [BK] ReiserFS file write bug fix for 2.4

On Wednesday 11 September 2002 19:53, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:34:11PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 September 2002 19:04, Hans Reiser wrote:
> > > Well, at least getting the new file write code into pre6 found this bug
> > > for us.... please apply.
> >
> > What is the "right" way to get the new block allocation going?
>
> use 2.4.19-pre2+ and it is in there ;)

You meant 2.4.20-pre2, didn't you?

> > The mount option (-o alloc=prealloc min=4:preallocsize=9) only or better
> > a "reformat"?
>
> Those mount options are no longer needed starting from 2.4.20-pre6.
> They are default. Reformat is not needed, but all the blocks allocated by
> old allocator will remain at their old places of course.
>
> Bye,
> Oleg

--
Dieter N?tzel
Graduate Student, Computer Science

University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
@home: Dieter.Nuetzel at hamburg.de (replace at with @)

2002-09-12 04:48:12

by Oleg Drokin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] [BK] ReiserFS file write bug fix for 2.4

Hello!

On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:37:22PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:34:11PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 11 September 2002 19:04, Hans Reiser wrote:
> > > > Well, at least getting the new file write code into pre6 found this bug
> > > > for us.... please apply.
> > > What is the "right" way to get the new block allocation going?
> > use 2.4.19-pre2+ and it is in there ;)
> You meant 2.4.20-pre2, didn't you?

Ah, yes. 2.4.20-pre2+ of course.

Bye,
Oleg