Hi David,
Please consider pulling from:
master.kernel.org:/home/acme/BK/x25-2.5
- Arnaldo
You can import this changeset into BK by piping this whole message to:
'| bk receive [path to repository]' or apply the patch as usual.
===================================================================
[email protected], 2002-10-07 01:15:18-03:00, [email protected]
o X25: fix permission bogosity in create_proc_entry usage
Thanks to Al Viro for reviewing this, this also fixes the
example that made me do this copy'n'paste brain fart.
wanrouter/wanproc.c | 26 +++-----------------------
x25/x25_proc.c | 15 ++-------------
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff -Nru a/net/wanrouter/wanproc.c b/net/wanrouter/wanproc.c
--- a/net/wanrouter/wanproc.c Mon Oct 7 01:17:09 2002
+++ b/net/wanrouter/wanproc.c Mon Oct 7 01:17:09 2002
@@ -61,9 +61,6 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
-/* Proc filesystem interface */
-static int router_proc_perms(struct inode *, int);
-
/* Miscellaneous */
/*
@@ -79,11 +76,6 @@
* Generic /proc/net/router/<file> file and inode operations
*/
-static struct inode_operations router_inode =
-{
- .permission = router_proc_perms,
-};
-
/*
* /proc/net/router
*/
@@ -99,15 +91,6 @@
/****** Proc filesystem entry points ****************************************/
/*
- * Verify access rights.
- */
-
-static int router_proc_perms (struct inode* inode, int op)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-/*
* Iterator
*/
static void *r_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
@@ -320,16 +303,14 @@
if (!proc_router)
goto fail;
- p = create_proc_entry("config",0,proc_router);
+ p = create_proc_entry("config", S_IRUGO, proc_router);
if (!p)
goto fail_config;
p->proc_fops = &config_fops;
- p->proc_iops = &router_inode;
- p = create_proc_entry("status",0,proc_router);
+ p = create_proc_entry("status", S_IRUGO, proc_router);
if (!p)
goto fail_stat;
p->proc_fops = &status_fops;
- p->proc_iops = &router_inode;
return 0;
fail_stat:
remove_proc_entry("config", proc_router);
@@ -359,11 +340,10 @@
if (wandev->magic != ROUTER_MAGIC)
return -EINVAL;
- wandev->dent = create_proc_entry(wandev->name, 0, proc_router);
+ wandev->dent = create_proc_entry(wandev->name, S_IRUGO, proc_router);
if (!wandev->dent)
return -ENOMEM;
wandev->dent->proc_fops = &wandev_fops;
- wandev->dent->proc_iops = &router_inode;
wandev->dent->data = wandev;
return 0;
}
diff -Nru a/net/x25/x25_proc.c b/net/x25/x25_proc.c
--- a/net/x25/x25_proc.c Mon Oct 7 01:17:09 2002
+++ b/net/x25/x25_proc.c Mon Oct 7 01:17:09 2002
@@ -202,15 +202,6 @@
.release = seq_release,
};
-static int x25_proc_perms(struct inode* inode, int op)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static struct inode_operations x25_seq_inode = {
- .permission = x25_proc_perms,
-};
-
static struct proc_dir_entry *x25_proc_dir;
int __init x25_proc_init(void)
@@ -222,17 +213,15 @@
if (!x25_proc_dir)
goto out;
- p = create_proc_entry("route", 0, x25_proc_dir);
+ p = create_proc_entry("route", S_IRUGO, x25_proc_dir);
if (!p)
goto out_route;
p->proc_fops = &x25_seq_route_fops;
- p->proc_iops = &x25_seq_inode;
- p = create_proc_entry("socket", 0, x25_proc_dir);
+ p = create_proc_entry("socket", S_IRUGO, x25_proc_dir);
if (!p)
goto out_socket;
p->proc_fops = &x25_seq_socket_fops;
- p->proc_iops = &x25_seq_inode;
rc = 0;
out:
return rc;
===================================================================
This BitKeeper patch contains the following changesets:
1.624
## Wrapped with gzip_uu ##
begin 664 bkpatch11053
M'XL(`,8*H3T``^U676_3,!1]KG_%%7L`Q-KZ(W:2HD[[0H!`VC08XFUR';>-
MUL25[7:KE!^/G=(QL:Z(L4>2-#>)KX^/?<]IL@>73MM!1ZI*HSWX8)P?=)2I
MM?+E4O:4J7HC&QHNC`D-_:FI=#_F]H\_]6\I[](>1Z'Y7'HUA:6V;M`A/7;W
MQ*_F>M"Y>/?^\O/1!4+#(9Q,93W17[2'X1!Y8Y=R5KA#Z:<S4_>\E;6KM&\'
M;NY2&XHQ#3LG*<-<-$3@)&T4*0B1"=$%IDDF$A1Y'?[._3<4@G&*&<D(;K"@
M@J%3(#U!$\"T3W`?IX#)@/`!R;J8#3"&K:#PAD(7HV-XW@F<(`4&OE,^@'%Y
M"W-MJ]*YTM0P,A/C2K^"L@9EM?3Z:FZ-NM*UMRM8.#G1H6\XOH8AKUW@!4<S
M^%9:`V-CP>IEJ6_*>@)^6KK]]@QRYDP<1X?T:>RN;V4UG^EP)SU4LM!0:2C,
M.EN9^>IE_7(NG=<PLC(0&4OK>^@3",(Q.O]56=3]RPTA+#$ZV+[63:U]E%K\
MM9/NJ?N5%(0T5`A&&U9@D:@TH:-,%QD9/P$N(9SPAF<YY8'.[N)&G!M96[/P
MVL:K>V`_2YWSO!&,9UF3XQ%)"R(2S49XG.@=W![#O$\P21+1NNGA9**MGG<=
MGPA'&T*2%+<&HP_LQ?]H+\+^^VOMK[4>SZ!K;]HC&.9\2^6?8+O3L&20AT`Y
M$/1Q'3IS&#Y<A%<O6E6^V(<O5Q\O+M^?[<-FZ*NBM*_?1I0\=#^EC+1@;7@,
MS!EUK?U.-!;);$2^Q15_?H'\DT6173B_.HQG9>R\E:9<[,9,28X%$12'VSQ+
M6^T3_K?B9]"E_\6_$7_[7[=%_%N*\!0'B`3"1T!&@:-3@FET`Z,L"G@='A-P
M*-NXG-P7<-NZIA3URV@*-*)DNVS@I5^X72B,1D\Q05M*;>B$"1=ZV3TH`LI6
DW$U"+2N]`UN(Z+#-MYJ::G7M%M40<ZG&.1^A']+\^D<="@``
`
end
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 01:19:07 -0300
Please consider pulling from:
master.kernel.org:/home/acme/BK/x25-2.5
All pulled, thanks.