Not sure if it's supposed to be a BUG() for tty to be NULL, but it's
surely a bug to dereference it before checking for that.
--- drivers/serial/core.c~ 2002-10-23 14:59:17.000000000 -0400
+++ drivers/serial/core.c 2002-10-23 14:59:42.000000000 -0400
@@ -472,10 +472,12 @@
static void uart_put_char(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned char ch)
{
- struct uart_info *info = tty->driver_data;
+ struct uart_info *info;
- if (tty)
+ if (tty) {
+ info = tty->driver_data;
__uart_put_char(info->port, &info->xmit, ch);
+ }
}
static void uart_flush_chars(struct tty_struct *tty)
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:02:11PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> Not sure if it's supposed to be a BUG() for tty to be NULL, but it's
> surely a bug to dereference it before checking for that.
>
Ug. Find one more after I sent this email.
--- drivers/serial/core.c~ 2002-10-23 14:59:17.000000000 -0400
+++ drivers/serial/core.c 2002-10-23 15:07:55.000000000 -0400
@@ -472,10 +472,12 @@
static void uart_put_char(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned char ch)
{
- struct uart_info *info = tty->driver_data;
+ struct uart_info *info;
- if (tty)
+ if (tty) {
+ info = tty->driver_data;
__uart_put_char(info->port, &info->xmit, ch);
+ }
}
static void uart_flush_chars(struct tty_struct *tty)
@@ -487,10 +489,15 @@
uart_write(struct tty_struct *tty, int from_user, const unsigned char * buf,
int count)
{
- struct uart_info *info = tty->driver_data;
+ struct uart_info *info;
int ret;
- if (!tty || !info->xmit.buf)
+ if (!tty)
+ return 0;
+
+ info = tty->driver_data;
+
+ if (!info->xmit.buf)
return 0;
if (from_user)
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/