Hi Marcelo,
$subject says it all. It's taken out of latest -ac 2.4 tree.
ciao, Marc
On Sunday 08 December 2002 00:18, J.A. Magallon wrote:
Hi J.A.,
> Ejem, does this mean that Andre's ide is going into 2.4.21-pre1 ?
> ;))))
finally!!!!!!!!!
:-))
ciao, Marc
On 2002.12.07 Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
>Hi Marcelo,
>
>$subject says it all. It's taken out of latest -ac 2.4 tree.
>
Ejem, does this mean that Andre's ide is going into 2.4.21-pre1 ?
;))))
--
J.A. Magallon <[email protected]> \ Software is like sex:
werewolf.able.es \ It's better when it's free
Mandrake Linux release 9.1 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.4.20-jam1 (gcc 3.2 (Mandrake Linux 9.1 3.2-4mdk))
On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 23:21, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> On Sunday 08 December 2002 00:18, J.A. Magallon wrote:
>
> Hi J.A.,
>
> > Ejem, does this mean that Andre's ide is going into 2.4.21-pre1 ?
> > ;))))
> finally!!!!!!!!!
Yes though various bits seem to have vanished in the submission
(system.h bits and ide-scsi). Davem has some follow up bits I need to
apply (the new IDE broke some weird 64bit bigendian platform that he
supports 8))
On Sat, 8 Dec 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 23:21, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> > On Sunday 08 December 2002 00:18, J.A. Magallon wrote:
> >
> > Hi J.A.,
> >
> > > Ejem, does this mean that Andre's ide is going into 2.4.21-pre1 ?
> > > ;))))
> > finally!!!!!!!!!
>
> Yes though various bits seem to have vanished in the submission
> (system.h bits and ide-scsi). Davem has some follow up bits I need to
> apply (the new IDE broke some weird 64bit bigendian platform that he
> supports 8))
system.h bits ? Dunno about those.
I'm fixing the ide-scsi now.