2002-12-12 06:51:57

by Matt Young

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: 2.5.50 Up and running but

Boot couldn't find the module dependency file, even though I did make modules
and make modules_install

Also the make config did not select the right Intel processor
nor is there a mouse driver

Having fun anyway.



2002-12-12 07:15:10

by Matt Reppert

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: 2.5.50 Up and running but

On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:59:10 -0800
Matt Young <[email protected]> wrote:

> Boot couldn't find the module dependency file, even though I did make modules
> and make modules_install

Yeah, the make rule for depmod got removed in one of the module merges. This
will put it back. (Untested, my init scripts run depmod so it's not a big deal
for me.) Rusty, am I being stupid or is this okay now that depmod works?

--- a/Makefile Sun Nov 10 19:05:55 2002
+++ b/Makefile Fri Nov 8 20:08:32 2002
@@ -157,7 +157,6 @@
OBJDUMP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objdump
AWK = awk
GENKSYMS = /sbin/genksyms
+DEPMOD = /sbin/depmod
KALLSYMS = /sbin/kallsyms
PERL = perl
MODFLAGS = -DMODULE
@@ -516,7 +515,7 @@
# Install modules

.PHONY: modules_install
-modules_install: _modinst_ $(patsubst %, _modinst_%, $(SUBDIRS))
+modules_install: _modinst_ $(patsubst %, _modinst_%, $(SUBDIRS)) _modinst_post

.PHONY: _modinst_
_modinst_:
@@ -524,20 +523,6 @@
@rm -f $(MODLIB)/build
@mkdir -p $(MODLIB)/kernel
@ln -s $(TOPDIR) $(MODLIB)/build
+
+# If System.map exists, run depmod. This deliberately does not have a
+# dependency on System.map since that would run the dependency tree on
+# vmlinux. This depmod is only for convenience to give the initial
+# boot a modules.dep even before / is mounted read-write. However the
+# boot script depmod is the master version.
+ifeq "$(strip $(INSTALL_MOD_PATH))" ""
+depmod_opts :=
+else
+depmod_opts := -b $(INSTALL_MOD_PATH) -r
+endif
+.PHONY: _modinst_post
+_modinst_post:
+ if [ -r System.map ]; then $(DEPMOD) -ae -F System.map $(depmod_opts) $(KERNELRELEASE); fi

.PHONY: $(patsubst %, _modinst_%, $(SUBDIRS))
$(patsubst %, _modinst_%, $(SUBDIRS)) :
.

> Also the make config did not select the right Intel processor

???

> nor is there a mouse driver

What kind of mouse? What config option?

Matt

2002-12-12 23:00:48

by Rusty Russell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: 2.5.50 Up and running but

In message <[email protected]> you write:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:59:10 -0800
> Matt Young <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Boot couldn't find the module dependency file, even though I did make modul
es
> > and make modules_install
>
> Yeah, the make rule for depmod got removed in one of the module merges. This
> will put it back. (Untested, my init scripts run depmod so it's not a big dea
l
> for me.) Rusty, am I being stupid or is this okay now that depmod
> works?

Yep, that's fine: the original modprobe replacement didn't need
modules.dep, but Adam Richter has 1300 modules and he complained about
the speed (and provided the patch to modprobe to use modules.dep, so
what could I say?)

Hopefully when Linus comes back he'll take my patches,
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.