(This is with rth's exception patch to fix the mount problem).
1) If compiled for the LX164 platform it is missing a number of symbols
at link time (fine if built generic):
arch/alpha/kernel/built-in.o(.data+0x3030): undefined reference to
`cia_bwx_inb'
arch/alpha/kernel/built-in.o(.data+0x3038): undefined reference to
`cia_bwx_inw'
.
.
.
(and a handful more)
2) This is a kind of subtle one. Straight after boot up if I run 'w'
or 'top' I get the warning:
Unknown HZ value! (831) Assume 1024.
This value creeps up:
Unknown HZ value! (958) Assume 1024.
over a period of a few minutes till the warning goes away.
Dave
---------------- Have a happy GNU millennium! ----------------------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM,SPARC,PPC & HPPA | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 00:33:27 +0000
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <[email protected]> wrote:
> (This is with rth's exception patch to fix the mount problem).
>
> 1) If compiled for the LX164 platform it is missing a number of symbols
> at link time (fine if built generic):
>
> arch/alpha/kernel/built-in.o(.data+0x3030): undefined reference to
> `cia_bwx_inb'
> arch/alpha/kernel/built-in.o(.data+0x3038): undefined reference to
> `cia_bwx_inw'
> .
> .
> .
> (and a handful more)
I had this exact same problem the other day, and this is fixed in -bk now.
Remove the #include <asm/io.h> in include/asm/pci.h.
Matt
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:33:27AM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> arch/alpha/kernel/built-in.o(.data+0x3030): undefined reference to
> `cia_bwx_inb'
> arch/alpha/kernel/built-in.o(.data+0x3038): undefined reference to
> `cia_bwx_inw'
Fixed in current TOT.
> 2) This is a kind of subtle one. Straight after boot up if I run 'w'
> or 'top' I get the warning:
>
> Unknown HZ value! (831) Assume 1024.
>
> This value creeps up:
>
> Unknown HZ value! (958) Assume 1024.
>
> over a period of a few minutes till the warning goes away.
Dunno. Could be your clock chip is going bad.
r~
* Richard Henderson ([email protected]) wrote:
> > arch/alpha/kernel/built-in.o(.data+0x3038): undefined reference to
> > `cia_bwx_inw'
>
> Fixed in current TOT.
Great.
> > Unknown HZ value! (831) Assume 1024.
> Dunno. Could be your clock chip is going bad.
Don't think so; with 2.4.19 it seems to be fine, and it returns to the
low value after restarting a kernel from MILO even without powering the
machine down or returning to AlphaBIOS.
Dave
---------------- Have a happy GNU millennium! ----------------------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM,SPARC,PPC & HPPA | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:49:37PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > Dunno. Could be your clock chip is going bad.
>
> Don't think so; with 2.4.19 it seems to be fine, and it returns to the
> low value after restarting a kernel from MILO even without powering the
> machine down or returning to AlphaBIOS.
On the other hand, the code hasn't changed since 2.4 either.
r~
I had a DS10 here that had, what appeared to be, a bad crystal. The clock
would start at about 1/2 to 3/4 the expected clock rate and over about 20
minutes would move towards what it should be at. It appeared to overshoot
the right clock-rate and then below until the oscillations would dampen
down to the correct rate.
I was doing RTLinux work on it so a bad clock wasn't acceptable. It lives
in the garage now since I had a another DS10 that worked right. I never
found what was actually going wrong with it or found a fix.
I would argue, though, that the Alpha clock itself is a crazy thing and
shouldn't be expected to work right :)
} * Richard Henderson ([email protected]) wrote:
} > > arch/alpha/kernel/built-in.o(.data+0x3038): undefined reference to
} > > `cia_bwx_inw'
} >
} > Fixed in current TOT.
}
} Great.
}
} > > Unknown HZ value! (831) Assume 1024.
}
} > Dunno. Could be your clock chip is going bad.
}
} Don't think so; with 2.4.19 it seems to be fine, and it returns to the
} low value after restarting a kernel from MILO even without powering the
} machine down or returning to AlphaBIOS.
}
} Dave
}
} ---------------- Have a happy GNU millennium! ----------------------
} / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \
} \ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM,SPARC,PPC & HPPA | In Hex /
} \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
} -
} To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
} the body of a message to [email protected]
} More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
} Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/