Since `try_module_get(module)' is really just `1' when modules are
disabled, the compiler bitches. As these definitions are inlines in a
header file, this results in a warning for every file that includes
modules.h.
diff -ruN -X../cludes linux-2.5.54-moo.orig/include/linux/module.h linux-2.5.54-moo/include/linux/module.h
--- linux-2.5.54-moo.orig/include/linux/module.h 2003-01-06 10:51:19.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.5.54-moo/include/linux/module.h 2003-01-06 16:30:28.000000000 +0900
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@
/*
* Yes, we ignore the retval here, that's why it's deprecated.
*/
- try_module_get(module);
+ (void)try_module_get(module);
}
static inline void __deprecated __MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT(struct module *module)
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@
local_inc(&module->ref[get_cpu()].count);
put_cpu();
#else
- try_module_get(module);
+ (void)try_module_get(module);
#endif
}
#define MOD_INC_USE_COUNT \
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 03:32:39PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Since `try_module_get(module)' is really just `1' when modules are
> disabled, the compiler bitches. As these definitions are inlines in a
> header file, this results in a warning for every file that includes
> modules.h.
Miles,
You're the third or fourth person that sends a patch for this
buglet, including myself. There's a (slightly different) version in
Linus bitkeeper tree already, from Richard Henderson, 2003/01/02.
--
Muli Ben-Yehuda
my opinions may seem crazy. But they all make sense. Insane sense, but
sense nontheless. -- Shlomi Fish on #offtopic.