2003-01-07 18:52:30

by Pavel Machek

Subject: kacpidpc needs to die

Hi!

For reasons discussed before [forking from timer is not safe, anyway],
kacpidpc needs to die. Andrew, are you going to kill it or should I do
it?

Pavel
--
Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net.
What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?

2003-01-08 18:49:22

by Andrew Grover

Subject: RE: kacpidpc needs to die

> From: Pavel Machek [mailto:[email protected]]
> For reasons discussed before [forking from timer is not safe, anyway],
> kacpidpc needs to die. Andrew, are you going to kill it or should I do
> it?

I can kill it...let me just verify with you --
acpi_os_queue_for_execution has a two block switch statement, just use
the first block (the case that uses schedule_work) and delete the rest,
yes?

Thanks -- Regards -- Andy