2003-02-18 18:32:54

by folkert

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: statistics of usage of this mailinglist

Overall statistics
------------------
First message was written at: 2003/02/04 13:00:00
Last message was written at: 2003/02/17 23:00:00
Total number of messages: 3115
Number of people who wrote >1 message: 338
Total number of lines: 341154
Average lines per message: 109
Total header length (lines): 148805
Average header length (lines): 47
The header is on average 43.62% of the message (lines).
Total number of bytes: 18898376
The header is 42.47% bytes in size of the total.
Average number of bits information per byte: 0.7500

Importance
----------
Low: 0.00%
Normal: 1.44%
High: 0.00%
(the rest is unspecified)

Top writers
----------------------------------------
1] Alan Cox <[email protected]> (105 msgs, 4305 average bytes)
2] "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]> (83 msgs, 5461 average bytes)
3] Andrew Morton <[email protected]> (80 msgs, 5012 average bytes)
4] Osamu Tomita <[email protected]> (70 msgs, 21214 average bytes)
5] Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]> (68 msgs, 6034 average bytes)
6] Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> (67 msgs, 4852 average bytes)
7] Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> (62 msgs, 3646 average bytes)
8] Dave Jones <[email protected]> (55 msgs, 3765 average bytes)
9] Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]> (49 msgs, 4927 average bytes)
10] John Bradford <[email protected]> (46 msgs, 3547 average bytes)

Top subjects
----------------------------------------------------------
1] openbkweb-0.0 (109 msgs, 4463 average bytes)
2] Monta Vista software license terms (83 msgs, 4409 average bytes)
3] [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59 (52 msgs, 4803 average bytes)
4] 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c (46 msgs, 4148 average
bytes)
5] Synchronous signal delivery.. (46 msgs, 4273 average bytes)
6] stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-ck3 / aa
/ rmap with contest] (43 msgs, 4670 average bytes)
7] gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance (42 msgs, 4000 average bytes)
8] [PATCH][RFC] Proposal for a new watchdog interface using sysfs (36 msgs,
6800 average bytes)
9] Kexec, DMA, and SMP (34 msgs, 5327 average bytes)
10] 2.5.60 cheerleading... (34 msgs, 3828 average bytes)

Top receivers
----------------------------------------------------------
1] [email protected] (427 msgs, 6418 average bytes)
2] Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> (122 msgs, 6497 average bytes)
3] Linux Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]> (90 msgs, 17749
average bytes)
4] Andrew Morton <[email protected]> (80 msgs, 6189 average bytes)
5] Linux Kernel <[email protected]> (78 msgs, 6505 average bytes)
6] [email protected] (53 msgs, 8760 average bytes)
7] Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]> (52 msgs, 4978 average bytes)
8] Linux-Kernel <[email protected]> (50 msgs, 6988 average bytes)
9] Alan Cox <[email protected]> (48 msgs, 5911 average bytes)
10] <[email protected]> (48 msgs, 7727 average bytes)

Top CC'ers
----------------------------------------------------------
1] [email protected] (468)
2] Linux Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]> (93)
3] Alan Cox <[email protected]> (52)
4] Kernel mailing list <[email protected]> (45)
5] lkml <[email protected]> (37)
6] Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> (35)
7] linux kernel mailing list <[email protected]>, (34)
8] Linux Kernel <[email protected]> (29)
9] [email protected], [email protected] (24)
10] Linux-Kernel <[email protected]> (24)

Messages per day
----------------------------------------------------------
Sunday 305 *****
Monday 449 ********
Tuesday 302 *****
Wednesday 551 **********
Thursday 378 ******
Friday 479 ********
Saturday 287 *****

Messages per Month
----------------------------------------------------------
Jan 6
Feb 2746
********************************************************************
Mar 0
Apr 0
May 0
Jun 0
Jul 0
Aug 0
Sep 0
Oct 0
Nov 0
Dec 0

Messages per day-of-the-month
----------------------------------------------------------
1 0
2 0
3 1
4 50 *
5 248 ******
6 180 ****
7 166 ****
8 69 *
9 128 ***
10 264 ******
11 249 ******
12 302 *******
13 194 ****
14 313 *******
15 219 *****
16 181 ****
17 185 ****
18 3
19 0
20 0
21 0
22 0
23 0
24 0
25 0
26 0
27 0
28 0
29 0
30 0
31 0

Messages per hour
----------------------------------------------------------
1 56 *
2 41 *
3 40 *
4 41 *
5 12
6 15
7 69 *
8 90 **
9 107 **
10 139 ***
11 164 ****
12 191 ****
13 178 ****
14 166 ****
15 212 *****
16 143 ***
17 176 ****
18 140 ***
19 122 ***
20 136 ***
21 152 ***
22 132 ***
23 139 ***

Created with mboxstats; written by [email protected]
http://www.vanheusden.com/mboxstats/

If you have any suggestion for other statistics to add, please tell me.


2003-02-18 18:50:02

by John Bradford

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: statistics of usage of this mailinglist

> If you have any suggestion for other statistics to add, please tell me.

Yes, this one:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=104386070814746&w=2

:-)

John.

2003-02-19 20:06:24

by Erik Tews

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: statistics of usage of this mailinglist

On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 07:40:21PM +0100, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> Messages per hour
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> 1 56 *
> 2 41 *
> 3 40 *
> 4 41 *
> 5 12
> 6 15
> 7 69 *
> 8 90 **
> 9 107 **
> 10 139 ***
> 11 164 ****
> 12 191 ****
> 13 178 ****
> 14 166 ****
> 15 212 *****
> 16 143 ***
> 17 176 ****
> 18 140 ***
> 19 122 ***
> 20 136 ***
> 21 152 ***
> 22 132 ***
> 23 139 ***

Looks intresting. But how does it look with time-zones. Are these stats
based on the local time of the senders or on your local time-zone?

2003-02-20 17:35:32

by folkert

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: statistics of usage of this mailinglist

> > Messages per hour
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > 1 56 *
> > 2 41 *
> > 3 40 *
...
> > 21 152 ***
> > 22 132 ***
> > 23 139 ***
> Looks intresting. But how does it look with time-zones. Are these stats
> based on the local time of the senders or on your local time-zone?

The senders local time. So you see at what time most users are active from
their point of view.