"David S. Miller" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2003-05-11 at 09:21, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > I am also seeing this on 69-bk (as of Sunday morning)
> ...
> > On May 10, 2003 11:19 pm, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > > I looked at my logs and found the following error in it. My kernel is
> > > 69-mm3 with two davem fixes on it.
> ...
> > > May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel: Call Trace:
> > > May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel: [__slab_error+30/32] __slab_error+0x1e/0x20
> > > May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel: [check_poison_obj+376/384]
> > > check_poison_obj+0x178/0x180 May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel:
> > > [kmalloc+221/392] kmalloc+0xdd/0x188 May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel:
> > > [alloc_skb+64/240] alloc_skb+0x40/0xf0 May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel:
>
> Yeah, more bugs in the NAT netfilter changes. Debugging this one
> patch is becomming a full time job :-(
>
> This should fix it. Rusty, you're computing checksums and mangling
> src/dst using header pointers potentially pointing to free'd skbs.
>
Did you mean to send a one megabyte diff?
From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 15:15:06 -0700
Did you mean to send a one megabyte diff?
Fuck wrong patch, that one was a 2.4.x backport of IPSEC enjoy :-)
On Sun, 2003-05-11 at 15:15, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "David S. Miller" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2003-05-11 at 09:21, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > > I am also seeing this on 69-bk (as of Sunday morning)
> > ...
> > > On May 10, 2003 11:19 pm, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > > > I looked at my logs and found the following error in it. My kernel is
> > > > 69-mm3 with two davem fixes on it.
> > ...
> > > > May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel: Call Trace:
> > > > May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel: [__slab_error+30/32] __slab_error+0x1e/0x20
> > > > May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel: [check_poison_obj+376/384]
> > > > check_poison_obj+0x178/0x180 May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel:
> > > > [kmalloc+221/392] kmalloc+0xdd/0x188 May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel:
> > > > [alloc_skb+64/240] alloc_skb+0x40/0xf0 May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel:
> >
> > Yeah, more bugs in the NAT netfilter changes. Debugging this one
> > patch is becomming a full time job :-(
> >
> > This should fix it. Rusty, you're computing checksums and mangling
> > src/dst using header pointers potentially pointing to free'd skbs.
> >
>
> Did you mean to send a one megabyte diff?
Let's try this again, here is the correct patch :-)
--
David S. Miller <[email protected]>
On May 11, 2003 06:34 pm, David S. Miller wrote:
> > > Yeah, more bugs in the NAT netfilter changes. Debugging this one
> > > patch is becomming a full time job :-(
But you do it well... Looks like this fixes the slab problems here with
69-bk from Sunday am.
> > > This should fix it. Rusty, you're computing checksums and mangling
> > > src/dst using header pointers potentially pointing to free'd skbs.
> >
> > Did you mean to send a one megabyte diff?
>
> Let's try this again, here is the correct patch :-)
Thanks
Ed Tomlinson
From: Ed Tomlinson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 03:44:50 -0400
On May 11, 2003 06:34 pm, David S. Miller wrote:
> > > Yeah, more bugs in the NAT netfilter changes. Debugging this one
> > > patch is becomming a full time job :-(
But you do it well... Looks like this fixes the slab problems here with
69-bk from Sunday am.
Thank you for testing.