Hi David,
Please pull from:
bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/net-2.5
Jens, this one fixes the problem you reported, thanks!
- Arnaldo
You can import this changeset into BK by piping this whole message to:
'| bk receive [path to repository]' or apply the patch as usual.
===================================================================
[email protected], 2003-05-14 23:19:24-03:00, [email protected]
o af_netlink: netlink_proto_init has to be core_initcall
As it has to happen before pktsched_init, that is called from
net_dev_init that is a subsys_initcall, making it the same
init level as netlink_proto_init, that ends up being called
_after_ net_dev_init, so when pktsched_init is called it finds
rtnetlink_links[PF_UNSPEC] as null and therefore not sets
the ->dumpit entry for RTM_GETQDISC (and the others too):
b00m, rtnetlink_rcv sends a failure message to tc.
af_netlink.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -Nru a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c Wed May 14 23:29:48 2003
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c Wed May 14 23:29:48 2003
@@ -1082,7 +1082,7 @@
remove_proc_entry("net/netlink", NULL);
}
-subsys_initcall(netlink_proto_init);
+core_initcall(netlink_proto_init);
module_exit(netlink_proto_exit);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
===================================================================
This BitKeeper patch contains the following changesets:
1.1115
## Wrapped with gzip_uu ##
M'XL( )S[PCX ^U566_:0!!^9G_%2'E)5#"[O@*NB)*2-(UZ49(\596UK->Q
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M1!M,P@VD&FJLC" N58YXU LCN5@IW85PT/.)7NI[K3;D?)H6-] $2= <"T=
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M%=/CE-&>!XQ<K'^W:F7_Z;,Y>+_YH\=]%E,]SP>1'=M])W+(;P3!<0E#"
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 23:35:50 -0300
Please pull from:
bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/net-2.5
Jens, this one fixes the problem you reported, thanks!
Pulled, thanks for fixing this bug Arnaldo.
On Wed, May 14 2003, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Please pull from:
>
> bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/net-2.5
>
> Jens, this one fixes the problem you reported, thanks!
I saw your patch in this mornings BK pull, and I can happily tell you
that it works. Thanks!
--
Jens Axboe