2003-05-30 12:15:16

by Michael Buesch

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: kupdated in 2.5

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi.

I recognized, that kupdated is no longer present (under that name?)
in 2.5.70. (or did I misconfigure something?)
I saw it, when i wanted to run noflushd on 2.5.
So, what has been changed here? Where can I get more information on it?

thanks!

- --
Regards Michael B?sch
http://www.8ung.at/tuxsoft
14:26:18 up 2:56, 3 users, load average: 1.10, 1.21, 1.10

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+105yoxoigfggmSgRApiRAJ499YHbKFk/r6TmDE3qYik2+r7LBgCfWnSd
njXtnbnZar9VnqRCOoQCNEE=
=0SWe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


2003-05-30 12:22:24

by Sean Neakums

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: kupdated in 2.5

Michael Buesch <[email protected]> writes:

> I recognized, that kupdated is no longer present (under that name?)
> in 2.5.70. (or did I misconfigure something?)
> I saw it, when i wanted to run noflushd on 2.5.
> So, what has been changed here? Where can I get more information on it?

I believe pdflush replaced kupdated in 2.5.

2003-05-30 20:00:16

by Mike Fedyk

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: kupdated in 2.5

On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 01:35:43PM +0100, Sean Neakums wrote:
> Michael Buesch <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > I recognized, that kupdated is no longer present (under that name?)
> > in 2.5.70. (or did I misconfigure something?)
> > I saw it, when i wanted to run noflushd on 2.5.
> > So, what has been changed here? Where can I get more information on it?
>
> I believe pdflush replaced kupdated in 2.5.

Didn't pdflush (one per processor) replace bdflush?