2003-06-11 09:52:07

by Joe Thornber

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] dm: Repair persistent minors

Split the dm_create() function into two variants, depending on whether
you want the device to have a specific minor number. This avoids
the broken overloading of the minor argument to the old dm_create().

--- diff/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c 2003-06-11 10:31:17.000000000 +0100
+++ source/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c 2003-06-11 10:32:11.000000000 +0100
@@ -560,7 +560,6 @@
int r;
struct dm_table *t;
struct mapped_device *md;
- unsigned int minor = 0;

r = check_name(param->name);
if (r)
@@ -577,9 +576,10 @@
}

if (param->flags & DM_PERSISTENT_DEV_FLAG)
- minor = minor(to_kdev_t(param->dev));
+ r = dm_create_with_minor(minor(to_kdev_t(param->dev)), t, &md);
+ else
+ r = dm_create(t, &md);

- r = dm_create(minor, t, &md);
if (r) {
dm_table_put(t);
return r;
--- diff/drivers/md/dm.c 2003-06-11 10:31:41.000000000 +0100
+++ source/drivers/md/dm.c 2003-06-11 10:32:54.000000000 +0100
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@
/*
* Allocate and initialise a blank device with a given minor.
*/
-static struct mapped_device *alloc_dev(unsigned int minor)
+static struct mapped_device *alloc_dev(unsigned int minor, int persistent)
{
int r;
struct mapped_device *md = kmalloc(sizeof(*md), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@
}

/* get a minor number for the dev */
- r = (minor < 0) ? next_free_minor(&minor) : specific_minor(minor);
+ r = persistent ? specific_minor(minor) : next_free_minor(&minor);
if (r < 0) {
kfree(md);
return NULL;
@@ -660,13 +660,13 @@
/*
* Constructor for a new device.
*/
-int dm_create(unsigned int minor, struct dm_table *table,
- struct mapped_device **result)
+static int create_aux(unsigned int minor, int persistent,
+ struct dm_table *table, struct mapped_device **result)
{
int r;
struct mapped_device *md;

- md = alloc_dev(minor);
+ md = alloc_dev(minor, persistent);
if (!md)
return -ENXIO;

@@ -681,6 +681,17 @@
return 0;
}

+int dm_create(struct dm_table *table, struct mapped_device **result)
+{
+ return create_aux(0, 0, table, result);
+}
+
+int dm_create_with_minor(unsigned int minor,
+ struct dm_table *table, struct mapped_device **result)
+{
+ return create_aux(minor, 1, table, result);
+}
+
void dm_get(struct mapped_device *md)
{
atomic_inc(&md->holders);
--- diff/drivers/md/dm.h 2003-06-11 10:31:27.000000000 +0100
+++ source/drivers/md/dm.h 2003-06-11 10:32:11.000000000 +0100
@@ -51,8 +51,9 @@
* Functions for manipulating a struct mapped_device.
* Drop the reference with dm_put when you finish with the object.
*---------------------------------------------------------------*/
-int dm_create(unsigned int minor, struct dm_table *table,
- struct mapped_device **md);
+int dm_create(struct dm_table *table, struct mapped_device **md);
+int dm_create_with_minor(unsigned int minor, struct dm_table *table,
+ struct mapped_device **md);

/*
* Reference counting for md.


2003-06-11 10:06:08

by Bernd Eckenfels

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dm: Repair persistent minors

In article <[email protected]> you wrote:
> Split the dm_create() function into two variants, depending on whether
> you want the device to have a specific minor number. This avoids
> the broken overloading of the minor argument to the old dm_create().

why dont you just call dm_create_with_minor() from dm_create and skip the
create_aux function? the create_aux function is pretty badly named, me
thinks. you sould at least call it dm_create_aux.

Greetings
Bernd
--
eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/
Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/

2003-06-11 11:46:13

by Joe Thornber

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dm: Repair persistent minors

On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 12:19:48PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[email protected]> you wrote:
> > Split the dm_create() function into two variants, depending on whether
> > you want the device to have a specific minor number. This avoids
> > the broken overloading of the minor argument to the old dm_create().
>
> why dont you just call dm_create_with_minor() from dm_create and skip the
> create_aux function?

Because I'm trying to avoid having a special value to the 'minor' arg
to indicate that we can use any minor.

> the create_aux function is pretty badly named, me
> thinks. you sould at least call it dm_create_aux.

I use the dm_ prefix for external functions.

- Joe