2003-06-23 15:09:06

by Matthew Wilcox

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PCI] Various legacy probing options


I'd like to take the logic that checks whether a bus has already
been scanned out of pcibios_scan_root() and push it down into
pci_scan_bus{,_parented}().

The trouble is that pci_scan_bus() already has a check for whether
a bus has been scanned or not and returns the opposite possibiity
(pcibios_scan_root() returns the bus if it exists; pci_scan_bus()
returns NULL if that bus already exists).

Most callers of pci_scan_bus() don't even bother to check the return
value, so they don't care if this changes. The only caller I can find
that actually cares is arch/i386/pci/irq.c:pirq_peer_trick() [can someone
check me on this? some of the architectures are a bit strange].

I wonder if this case ever occurs, though. pirq_peer_trick() is called
from pcibios_irq_init() which is a subsys_initcall. irq.o is linked
after legacy.o, which contains the subsys_initcall pci_legacy_init(),
which calls pcibios_fixup_peer_bridges() which already iterates over
0-pcibios_last_bus looking for busses.

Are there really broken PCs out there that will have additional bridges
found in the PIRQ tables after pcibios_last_bus?

--
"It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk


2003-07-04 09:20:04

by Martin Mares

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PCI] Various legacy probing options

Hello!

> Are there really broken PCs out there that will have additional bridges
> found in the PIRQ tables after pcibios_last_bus?

Probably not, but many of the ancient BIOSes just set the last bus to 0xff.

Have a nice fortnight
--
Martin `MJ' Mares <[email protected]> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/
Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
"Dijkstra probably hates me." -- /usr/src/linux/kernel/sched.c