2.6.0-test3 and earlier provide only a very limited form of console on
a Siemens Primergy H450.
For example, pressing RET yields:
atkbd.c: Unknown key (set 0, scancode 0xed, on isa0060/serio0) pressed.
So far, I only tested remotedly, using the built-in console
redirection support. 2.4.20 works like a charm (using remote console,
I think we never tested the local one).
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 07:00:27PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> 2.6.0-test3 and earlier provide only a very limited form of console on
> a Siemens Primergy H450.
>
> For example, pressing RET yields:
>
> atkbd.c: Unknown key (set 0, scancode 0xed, on isa0060/serio0) pressed.
>
> So far, I only tested remotedly, using the built-in console
> redirection support. 2.4.20 works like a charm (using remote console,
> I think we never tested the local one).
Set 0 is "impossible", certainly a bug.
So what are the boot messages about the keyboard?
Andries Brouwer <[email protected]> writes:
>> atkbd.c: Unknown key (set 0, scancode 0xed, on isa0060/serio0) pressed.
> Set 0 is "impossible", certainly a bug.
> So what are the boot messages about the keyboard?
serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1
I hope these lines are the correct ones.
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 09:26:16PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Andries Brouwer <[email protected]> writes:
>
> >> atkbd.c: Unknown key (set 0, scancode 0xed, on isa0060/serio0) pressed.
>
> > Set 0 is "impossible", certainly a bug.
> > So what are the boot messages about the keyboard?
>
> serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
> serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1
>
> I hope these lines are the correct ones.
But no lines like
input: AT Set 2 keyboard on isa0060/serio0
?
Andries Brouwer <[email protected]> writes:
>> serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
>> serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1
>>
>> I hope these lines are the correct ones.
>
> But no lines like
>
> input: AT Set 2 keyboard on isa0060/serio0
>
> ?
I suppose such a line would follow the serio ones?
Then the answer is no. However, the string is conained into the
vmlinux binary, so I guess the feature has been compiled into the
kernel.