Hmmm... looks like 130k is too big for lk so I'll resend all split up.
----- Forwarded message from CaT <[email protected]> -----
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:10:55 +1000
From: CaT <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH] 2.6.0-t3: struct C99 initialiser conversion
Organisation: Furball Inc.
Ok. I think I did it.
I used grep+sed at first and then went through the resulting patches,
fixing any problems by hand until I could spot no more. It was a lot
of fun weeding out the mistakenly changed bit-definitions but I think
I got them all. I also compiled the kernel with make allyesconfig,
checking into compile failure for anything I broke. Obviously though,
the more people that check this the better.
Also, while I finally decided on a single patch, I can split if
need be. It's 100k and not that hard to go through, esp with syntax
highlighting (I should know... I went through it several times :)
Anyhow... here goes...
----- End forwarded message -----
--
"How can I not love the Americans? They helped me with a flat tire the
other day," he said.
- http://tinyurl.com/h6fo
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:30:51PM +1000, CaT wrote:
> Hmmm... looks like 130k is too big for lk so I'll resend all split up.
Could you please use more sensible subject - for example:
[PATCH] Documentation/ - C99 designators
So people from the subject can see if they have interest in that part
of the kernel.
Sam