Hi,
I have a problem with my sagem 800 modem on my USB Controller: VIA
Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10), using kernel 2.4.20.
After connecting to the net, the modem disconnects and I get an error:
***
Sep 27 12:51:56 niedakh NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
Sep 27 12:51:56 niedakh [Adi] Transmit timed out!
Sep 27 12:51:56 niedakh [Adi] transmit URB e5cce0bc cancelled
***
I have to reload its firmware in order for it to work again.
I talked to manypeople about this. I was told to try booting with noapic or
acpi=off. Unfortunately the same error happened with apci=off or noapic or
even both. On eagle forums I was pointed to check my controllers altency
(how do you do that?) which reminded me I had a similar situation on win2k on
the same machine, but after installing via 4in1 update for usb it started to
work properly on win2k. i google for "usb via latency" and found a via usb
latency patch for windows, I didnt find a linux version of the latency patch
for via anywhere.
Noone around knows how to fix this, so Im mailing here.
Thanks for any replies.
--
Piotr Szyma?ski
[email protected]; djurban.jogger.pl
JID: [email protected]; GG 2300264; ICQ: 12622400
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 04:43:25PM +0200, Piotr Szyma?ski wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I have a problem with my sagem 800 modem on my USB Controller: VIA
> Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10), using kernel 2.4.20.
> After connecting to the net, the modem disconnects and I get an error:
> ***
> Sep 27 12:51:56 niedakh NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
> Sep 27 12:51:56 niedakh [Adi] Transmit timed out!
> Sep 27 12:51:56 niedakh [Adi] transmit URB e5cce0bc cancelled
> ***
> I have to reload its firmware in order for it to work again.
> I talked to manypeople about this. I was told to try booting with noapic or
> acpi=off. Unfortunately the same error happened with apci=off or noapic or
> even both. On eagle forums I was pointed to check my controllers altency
> (how do you do that?) which reminded me I had a similar situation on win2k on
lspci -v
Ofcourse, you can use powertweak utility too.
> the same machine, but after installing via 4in1 update for usb it started to
> work properly on win2k. i google for "usb via latency" and found a via usb
hmm, this sound interesting. So, did you tried use uhci usb adapter
instead of usb-uhci? Maybe it will works better.
> latency patch for windows, I didnt find a linux version of the latency patch
> for via anywhere.
> Noone around knows how to fix this, so Im mailing here.
> Thanks for any replies.
> --
> Piotr Szyma?ski
> [email protected]; djurban.jogger.pl
--
-------------------------------------------------------
David "Dave" Jez Brno, CZ, Europe
E-mail: [email protected]
PGP key: finger [email protected]
---------=[ ~EOF ]=------------------------------------
Hi,
On Saturday 27 of September 2003 17:17, David Jez wrote:
> lspci -v
00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10) (prog-if 00
[UHCI])
Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. (Wrong ID) USB Controller
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 7
I/O ports at c400 [size=32]
Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
> Ofcourse, you can use powertweak utility too.
Cool, thanks for the tip, last thing remaining (maybe you know thisas well),
what value should I to set it to?
> hmm, this sound interesting. So, did you tried use uhci usb adapter
> instead of usb-uhci? Maybe it will works better.
Ive been using it all the time.
--
Piotr Szyma?ski
[email protected]; djurban.jogger.pl
JID: [email protected]; GG 2300264; ICQ: 12622400
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 05:50:40PM +0200, Piotr Szyma?ski wrote:
> Hi,
> On Saturday 27 of September 2003 17:17, David Jez wrote:
> > lspci -v
> 00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10) (prog-if 00
> [UHCI])
> Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. (Wrong ID) USB Controller
> Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 7
> I/O ports at c400 [size=32]
> Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
>
> > Ofcourse, you can use powertweak utility too.
> Cool, thanks for the tip, last thing remaining (maybe you know thisas well),
> what value should I to set it to?
less value is less latency, you can try 0 instead of 32. But if via
has got any problem with their HW which is workarounded in m$win...
maybe this will not help you :*(
> > hmm, this sound interesting. So, did you tried use uhci usb adapter
> > instead of usb-uhci? Maybe it will works better.
> Ive been using it all the time.
And what about other USB devices? e.g. USB flash disks works fine?
> --
> Piotr Szyma?ski
> [email protected]; djurban.jogger.pl
> JID: [email protected]; GG 2300264; ICQ: 12622400
--
-------------------------------------------------------
David "Dave" Jez Brno, CZ, Europe
E-mail: [email protected]
PGP key: finger [email protected]
---------=[ ~EOF ]=------------------------------------