Hi,
kgdb 2.0.4 is available at http://kgdb.sourceforge.net ChangeLog below.
Thanks.
--
Amit Kale
EmSysSoft (http://www.emsyssoft.com)
KGDB: Linux Kernel Source Level Debugger (http://kgdb.sourceforge.net)
2004-01-17 Tom Rini <[email protected]>
* Some restructuring to allow architectures to provide different
serial infos to the kgdb serial interface.
2004-01-17 Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
* Cleanups
* changed calling convention from 0 on success, 1 on failure to 0 on
success, -ERRNO on fail to be more consistent with rest of kernel
* Made kgdb waiting for connection message KERN_CRIT
* export kern_schedule only if CONFIG_KGDB_THREAD is defined
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 02:51:38PM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> kgdb 2.0.4 is available at http://kgdb.sourceforge.net ChangeLog below.
> Thanks.
> Amit Kale
> EmSysSoft (http://www.emsyssoft.com)
> KGDB: Linux Kernel Source Level Debugger (http://kgdb.sourceforge.net)
> 2004-01-17 Tom Rini <[email protected]>
> * Some restructuring to allow architectures to provide different
> serial infos to the kgdb serial interface.
> 2004-01-17 Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
> * Cleanups
> * changed calling convention from 0 on success, 1 on failure to 0 on
> success, -ERRNO on fail to be more consistent with rest of kernel
> * Made kgdb waiting for connection message KERN_CRIT
> * export kern_schedule only if CONFIG_KGDB_THREAD is defined
This sound great. Any chance you could splatter this out at a patch
series to lkml for those of us so entrenched in pre-1994 conventions
(such as myself) as to dislike chasing URL's from mailing list posts?
-- wli
Ah...
I understand. I also don't like URLs in email as my browser and mailer are
different.
I am really sorry, the best I can do is post a link to actuall tarball which
is: http://kgdb.sourceforge.net/kgdb-2/linux-2.6.1-kgdb-2.0.4.tar.bz2
I believe people will have me on their spammers list if I actually inflate
this tarball and send as attachments. I sent 3 such postings this week!
On Saturday 17 Jan 2004 3:31 pm, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 02:51:38PM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> > kgdb 2.0.4 is available at http://kgdb.sourceforge.net ChangeLog below.
> > Thanks.
> > Amit Kale
> > EmSysSoft (http://www.emsyssoft.com)
> > KGDB: Linux Kernel Source Level Debugger (http://kgdb.sourceforge.net)
> > 2004-01-17 Tom Rini <[email protected]>
> > * Some restructuring to allow architectures to provide different
> > serial infos to the kgdb serial interface.
> > 2004-01-17 Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
> > * Cleanups
> > * changed calling convention from 0 on success, 1 on failure to 0 on
> > success, -ERRNO on fail to be more consistent with rest of kernel
> > * Made kgdb waiting for connection message KERN_CRIT
> > * export kern_schedule only if CONFIG_KGDB_THREAD is defined
>
> This sound great. Any chance you could splatter this out at a patch
> series to lkml for those of us so entrenched in pre-1994 conventions
> (such as myself) as to dislike chasing URL's from mailing list posts?
>
>
> -- wli
--
Amit Kale
EmSysSoft (http://www.emsyssoft.com)
KGDB: Linux Kernel Source Level Debugger (http://kgdb.sourceforge.net)
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 03:54:21PM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> Ah...
> I understand. I also don't like URLs in email as my browser and mailer are
> different.
> I am really sorry, the best I can do is post a link to actuall tarball which
> is: http://kgdb.sourceforge.net/kgdb-2/linux-2.6.1-kgdb-2.0.4.tar.bz2
> I believe people will have me on their spammers list if I actually inflate
> this tarball and send as attachments. I sent 3 such postings this week!
That's okay, I'll dig through the website in the near future.
It's just harder, but the value of your patches and those you're
integrating will ultimately compensate.
-- wli
Hi!
> I understand. I also don't like URLs in email as my browser and mailer are
> different.
>
> I am really sorry, the best I can do is post a link to actuall tarball which
> is: http://kgdb.sourceforge.net/kgdb-2/linux-2.6.1-kgdb-2.0.4.tar.bz2
>
> I believe people will have me on their spammers list if I actually inflate
> this tarball and send as attachments. I sent 3 such postings this
> week!
Well, its 30K archive, that's pretty small. Sending it as patches has
advantage that more people will actually see it and point errors...
Pavel
--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]