2004-04-13 17:05:54

by Jeff Garzik

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFT] please test the big post-2.6.5 merge


The snapshot 2.6.5-bk1 is out, and has a _ton_ of changes in it that
have been waiting to go upstream for several weeks. This snapshot
includes many more _major_ changes than most snapshots, so I wanted to
call special attention to it, and request testing and feedback from
linux-kernel denizens.

Changelog describing the 457 changes in this snapshot:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch-2.6.5-bk1.log

Patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch-2.6.5-bk1.bz2

Short, jgarzik-generated list of major changes that probably want testing:
* non-exec stack support
* much better block I/O unplugging (I/O scalability)
* laptop mode
* lots of VM work (often related to I/O or Hugh's rmap/anonvma stuff)
* 4K stacks
* updated software suspend
* early x86 boot changes
* several ext2/ext3/jbd improvements
* new "CFQ" I/O scheduler
* queue congestion hooks
* DM, MD fixes (some related to the queue congestion/unplugging changes)
* posix message queue work from Manfred
* lightweight auditing framework
* reiserfs fixes and features
* readahead tweaks and fixes
* writeback tweaks
* direct-IO and AIO fixes and speed-ups
* shrinkage from Matt Mackall's -tiny tree
* /dev/urandom scalability
* update slab for per-arch alignments
* initramfs fix
* knfsd fixes and updates
* nfs client fixes/updates
* pcmcia update
* SATA update
* selinux update
* v4l update
* various arch updates: H8300, s/390, ppc32, ppc64, x86-64, nommu, arm, ...





2004-04-13 19:55:46

by Cliff White

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFT] please test the big post-2.6.5 merge

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:05:28 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> The snapshot 2.6.5-bk1 is out, and has a _ton_ of changes in it that
> have been waiting to go upstream for several weeks. This snapshot
> includes many more _major_ changes than most snapshots, so I wanted to
> call special attention to it, and request testing and feedback from
> linux-kernel denizens.
>
> Changelog describing the 457 changes in this snapshot:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch-2.6.5-bk1.log
>
> Patch:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch-2.6.5-bk1.bz2
>
> Short, jgarzik-generated list of major changes that probably want testing:
> * non-exec stack support
> * much better block I/O unplugging (I/O scalability)
> * laptop mode
> * lots of VM work (often related to I/O or Hugh's rmap/anonvma stuff)
> * 4K stacks
> * updated software suspend
> * early x86 boot changes
> * several ext2/ext3/jbd improvements
> * new "CFQ" I/O scheduler
> * queue congestion hooks
> * DM, MD fixes (some related to the queue congestion/unplugging changes)
> * posix message queue work from Manfred
> * lightweight auditing framework
> * reiserfs fixes and features
> * readahead tweaks and fixes
> * writeback tweaks
> * direct-IO and AIO fixes and speed-ups
> * shrinkage from Matt Mackall's -tiny tree
> * /dev/urandom scalability
> * update slab for per-arch alignments
> * initramfs fix
> * knfsd fixes and updates
> * nfs client fixes/updates
> * pcmcia update
> * SATA update
> * selinux update
> * v4l update
> * various arch updates: H8300, s/390, ppc32, ppc64, x86-64, nommu, arm, ...
>
>

We've added a bunch more STP runs against this kernel. Results should be coming out
this evening...
cliffw
OSDL

>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>


--
The church is near, but the road is icy.
The bar is far, but i will walk carefully. - Russian proverb

2004-04-13 21:21:38

by Jeff Garzik

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFT] please test the big post-2.6.5 merge

J.A.Magallon wrote:
>
> On 13 abr 2004, at 19:05, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>
>> The snapshot 2.6.5-bk1 is out, and has a _ton_ of changes in it that have
>
> ...
>
>> * 4K stacks
>
>
> Fixed or CONFIG_ ?
> If fixed, this will make unhappy a _ton_ of users...


+config 4KSTACKS
+ bool "Use 4Kb for kernel stacks instead of 8Kb"