2004-06-03 12:17:29

by Herbert Xu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [CPUFREQ] Make powernow-k7 work with CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR == m

Hi:

The last round of updates to powernow-k7.c broke it when
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR is built as a module. This patch
fixes that.

Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt


Attachments:
(No filename) (350.00 B)
p (1.15 kB)
Download all attachments

2004-06-03 12:38:11

by Dave Jones

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [CPUFREQ] Make powernow-k7 work with CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR == m

On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:17:04PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Hi:
>
> The last round of updates to powernow-k7.c broke it when
> CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR is built as a module. This patch
> fixes that.

How strange, I could swear I already merged this patch into
the last round that went to Linus. I'll make sure it gets
into the next one. There's been some corruption with the
cpufreq -bk tree the last few days which has only just got
fixed up, so I'm a little behind on cpufreq patches.

Dave

2004-06-03 17:02:39

by Tony Lindgren

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [CPUFREQ] Make powernow-k7 work with CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR == m

* Dave Jones <[email protected]> [040603 05:38]:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:17:04PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> > The last round of updates to powernow-k7.c broke it when
> > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR is built as a module. This patch
> > fixes that.
>
> How strange, I could swear I already merged this patch into
> the last round that went to Linus. I'll make sure it gets
> into the next one. There's been some corruption with the
> cpufreq -bk tree the last few days which has only just got
> fixed up, so I'm a little behind on cpufreq patches.

The Deja Vu was the same patch for powernow-k8.

Regards,

Tony