2004-09-01 08:36:55

by Rick Lindsley

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: 2.6.9-rc1-mm2

Thanks for pointing out the specific config options.

Granted a more recent config is warranted .. the one I'm using is
2.6.0-based. But considering I ran make oldconfig on this and chose
the defaults in each and every case, should I end up with a config that
doesn't compile? Is there still a config issue here, especially
considering that both rc1 and rc1-mm1 compiled fine using this method?
Or is make oldconfig only going to help for a version or two back?

Rick


2004-09-01 08:43:53

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: 2.6.9-rc1-mm2

Rick Lindsley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> But considering I ran make oldconfig on this and chose
> the defaults in each and every case, should I end up with a config that
> doesn't compile?

No, you shouldn't. This indicates a Kconfig bug.