On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 at 22:28:36 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > You can discuss about that: reiserfs_fs.h used current including sched.h.
> ^
> Oops, there's a missing `without' here...
Yes, but reiserfs_fs.h includes smp_lock.h, and that included sched.h until
you removed it. Now that sched.h is back in smp_lock.h, its inclusion directly
in reiserfs_fs.h should be unnecessary...
--Chuck Ebbert 03-Nov-04 20:06:17