Hi Andrew,
Addresses of functions are returned by their name without
parantheses. Remove an & in main.c
Sorry for the attachment. My mailer is currently broken and
corrupts diffs.
BTW:
I have two strange oopses. Can the additional & be the reason
for the oopses? They look very strange to me, hmm.
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00020800
printing eip:
00020800
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1]
SMP
Modules linked in: ipv6 ohci_hcd tuner tvaudio msp3400 bttv video_buf btcx_risc nvidia ehci_hcd uhci_hcd usbcore intel_agp agpgart evdev
CPU: 0
EIP: 0060:[<00020800>] Tainted: P VLI
EFLAGS: 00010296 (2.6.9-ck3-ac6-nozeroram)
EIP is at 0x20800
eax: 00000001 ebx: b03e6000 ecx: 00000001 edx: 00000084
esi: 00099100 edi: b01020a7 ebp: 00459007 esp: b03e7fec
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo=b03e6000 task=b034bac0)
Stack: b03e881c 000000d9 b03e8310 b04132a0 b0100211
Call Trace:
[<b03e881c>] start_kernel+0x139/0x152
[<b03e8310>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x171
Code: Bad EIP value.
<0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00099108
printing eip:
b01020a7
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1]
SMP
Modules linked in: nvidia ohci_hcd tuner tvaudio msp3400 bttv video_buf btcx_risc ehci_hcd uhci_hcd usbcore intel_agp agpgart evdev
CPU: 0
EIP: 0060:[<b01020a7>] Tainted: P VLI
EFLAGS: 00010292 (2.6.9-ck2-ac4-nozeroram)
EIP is at cpu_idle+0x2e/0x3c
eax: 00000001 ebx: 00099100 ecx: 00000000 edx: 0000001d
esi: 00000000 edi: 00000008 ebp: 004f3007 esp: b0477fe8
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo=b0476000 task=b03ccac0)
Stack: 00020800 b047881c 000000dd b0478310 b04a62a0 b0100211
Call Trace:
[<b047881c>] start_kernel+0x139/0x152
[<b0478310>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x171
Code: e0 ff ff 21 e3 eb 24 8b 0d 80 56 4a b0 b8 1a 20 10 b0 8b 15 a0 e5 3c b0 85 c9 0f 44 c8 8b 43 10 c1 e0 07 89 90 04 ea 4a b0 ff d1 <8b> 43 08 a8 08 74 d5 e8 0d a9 26 00 eb f2 56 53 fb ba 00 e0 ff
<0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
Michael Buesch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Addresses of functions are returned by their name without
> parantheses. Remove an & in main.c
Using `&' in fornt of a function name when passing the function's address
is unnecessary and is kinda dorky, but your patch shouldn't change
generated code.
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00020800
> printing eip:
> 00020800
> *pde = 00000000
> Oops: 0000 [#1]
> SMP
> Modules linked in: ipv6 ohci_hcd tuner tvaudio msp3400 bttv video_buf btcx_risc nvidia ehci_hcd uhci_hcd usbcore intel_agp agpgart evdev
> CPU: 0
> EIP: 0060:[<00020800>] Tainted: P VLI
> EFLAGS: 00010296 (2.6.9-ck3-ac6-nozeroram)
> EIP is at 0x20800
> eax: 00000001 ebx: b03e6000 ecx: 00000001 edx: 00000084
> esi: 00099100 edi: b01020a7 ebp: 00459007 esp: b03e7fec
> ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
> Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo=b03e6000 task=b034bac0)
> Stack: b03e881c 000000d9 b03e8310 b04132a0 b0100211
> Call Trace:
> [<b03e881c>] start_kernel+0x139/0x152
> [<b03e8310>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x171
> Code: Bad EIP value.
> <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
>
>
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00099108
> printing eip:
> b01020a7
> *pde = 00000000
> Oops: 0000 [#1]
> SMP
> Modules linked in: nvidia ohci_hcd tuner tvaudio msp3400 bttv video_buf btcx_risc ehci_hcd uhci_hcd usbcore intel_agp agpgart evdev
> CPU: 0
> EIP: 0060:[<b01020a7>] Tainted: P VLI
> EFLAGS: 00010292 (2.6.9-ck2-ac4-nozeroram)
> EIP is at cpu_idle+0x2e/0x3c
> eax: 00000001 ebx: 00099100 ecx: 00000000 edx: 0000001d
> esi: 00000000 edi: 00000008 ebp: 004f3007 esp: b0477fe8
> ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
> Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo=b0476000 task=b03ccac0)
> Stack: 00020800 b047881c 000000dd b0478310 b04a62a0 b0100211
> Call Trace:
> [<b047881c>] start_kernel+0x139/0x152
> [<b0478310>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x171
> Code: e0 ff ff 21 e3 eb 24 8b 0d 80 56 4a b0 b8 1a 20 10 b0 8b 15 a0 e5 3c b0 85 c9 0f 44 c8 8b 43 10 c1 e0 07 89 90 04 ea 4a b0 ff d1 <8b> 43 08 a8 08 74 d5 e8 0d a9 26 00 eb f2 56 53 fb ba 00 e0 ff
> <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
hm, I don't know what happened there. Maybe the value of pm_idle in
cpu_idle() is garbage. Or maybe not.
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Michael Buesch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Hi Andrew,
>>
>>Addresses of functions are returned by their name without
>>parantheses. Remove an & in main.c
>
>
> Using `&' in fornt of a function name when passing the function's address
> is unnecessary and is kinda dorky, but your patch shouldn't change
> generated code.
>
>
>>Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00020800
>> printing eip:
>>00020800
>>*pde = 00000000
>>Oops: 0000 [#1]
>>SMP
>>Modules linked in: ipv6 ohci_hcd tuner tvaudio msp3400 bttv video_buf btcx_risc nvidia ehci_hcd uhci_hcd usbcore intel_agp agpgart evdev
>>CPU: 0
>>EIP: 0060:[<00020800>] Tainted: P VLI
>>EFLAGS: 00010296 (2.6.9-ck3-ac6-nozeroram)
>>EIP is at 0x20800
>>eax: 00000001 ebx: b03e6000 ecx: 00000001 edx: 00000084
>>esi: 00099100 edi: b01020a7 ebp: 00459007 esp: b03e7fec
>>ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
>>Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo=b03e6000 task=b034bac0)
>>Stack: b03e881c 000000d9 b03e8310 b04132a0 b0100211
>>Call Trace:
>> [<b03e881c>] start_kernel+0x139/0x152
>> [<b03e8310>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x171
>>Code: Bad EIP value.
>> <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
>>
>>
>>Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00099108
>> printing eip:
>>b01020a7
>>*pde = 00000000
>>Oops: 0000 [#1]
>>SMP
>>Modules linked in: nvidia ohci_hcd tuner tvaudio msp3400 bttv video_buf btcx_risc ehci_hcd uhci_hcd usbcore intel_agp agpgart evdev
>>CPU: 0
>>EIP: 0060:[<b01020a7>] Tainted: P VLI
>>EFLAGS: 00010292 (2.6.9-ck2-ac4-nozeroram)
>>EIP is at cpu_idle+0x2e/0x3c
>>eax: 00000001 ebx: 00099100 ecx: 00000000 edx: 0000001d
>>esi: 00000000 edi: 00000008 ebp: 004f3007 esp: b0477fe8
>>ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
>>Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo=b0476000 task=b03ccac0)
>>Stack: 00020800 b047881c 000000dd b0478310 b04a62a0 b0100211
>>Call Trace:
>> [<b047881c>] start_kernel+0x139/0x152
>> [<b0478310>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x171
>>Code: e0 ff ff 21 e3 eb 24 8b 0d 80 56 4a b0 b8 1a 20 10 b0 8b 15 a0 e5 3c b0 85 c9 0f 44 c8 8b 43 10 c1 e0 07 89 90 04 ea 4a b0 ff d1 <8b> 43 08 a8 08 74 d5 e8 0d a9 26 00 eb f2 56 53 fb ba 00 e0 ff
>> <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
>
>
> hm, I don't know what happened there. Maybe the value of pm_idle in
> cpu_idle() is garbage. Or maybe not.
Zwane and someone else had patches for that happening IIRC
a month or 2 back.
I can dig them out if wanted... Michael, want to try?
--
~Randy
Quoting "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>:
> > hm, I don't know what happened there. Maybe the value of pm_idle in
> > cpu_idle() is garbage. Or maybe not.
>
> Zwane and someone else had patches for that happening IIRC
> a month or 2 back.
> I can dig them out if wanted... Michael, want to try?
Yes, sure. Please.
oh, one second before pressing the send button for this mail I had
another panic. 8-}
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00020800
printing eip:
00020800
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1]
SMP
Modules linked in: ipv6 ohci_hcd tuner tvaudio msp3400 bttv video_buf btcx_risc nvidia ehci_hcd uhci_hcd usbcore intel_agp agpgart evdev
CPU: 0
EIP: 0060:[<00020800>] Tainted: P VLI
EFLAGS: 00010296 (2.6.9-ck3-ac6-nozeroram)
EIP is at 0x20800
eax: 00000001 ebx: b03e8000 ecx: 00000001 edx: 00000001
esi: 00099100 edi: b01020a7 ebp: 0045c007 esp: b03e9fec
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo=b03e8000 task=b034cac0)
Stack: b03ea81c 000000db b03ea310 b04162a0 b0100211
Call Trace:
[<b03ea81c>] start_kernel+0x139/0x152
[<b03ea310>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x171
Code: Bad EIP value.
<0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
Michael Buesch wrote:
> Quoting "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>:
>
>>>hm, I don't know what happened there. Maybe the value of pm_idle in
>>>cpu_idle() is garbage. Or maybe not.
>>
>>Zwane and someone else had patches for that happening IIRC
>>a month or 2 back.
>>I can dig them out if wanted... Michael, want to try?
>
>
>
> Yes, sure. Please.
OK, there are several patches flying around that may fix this.
or maybe not...
And I don't know what it already in -ckX -acN either, so they might
not apply cleanly. (also checking -mm now....)
From BlaisorBlade:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=109441393614805&w=2
From Shaohua Li:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109470272821630&w=2
From Zwane (update of above):
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=109473286622679&w=2
--
~Randy
Quoting "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>:
> Michael Buesch wrote:
> > Quoting "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>:
> >
> >>>hm, I don't know what happened there. Maybe the value of pm_idle in
> >>>cpu_idle() is garbage. Or maybe not.
> >>
> >>Zwane and someone else had patches for that happening IIRC
> >>a month or 2 back.
> >>I can dig them out if wanted... Michael, want to try?
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes, sure. Please.
>
> OK, there are several patches flying around that may fix this.
> or maybe not...
>
> And I don't know what it already in -ckX -acN either, so they might
> not apply cleanly. (also checking -mm now....)
>
> From BlaisorBlade:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=109441393614805&w=2
>
> From Shaohua Li:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109470272821630&w=2
>
> From Zwane (update of above):
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=109473286622679&w=2
Already applied. (Don't know. Maybe ck or ac did it).
Must be something else going on here. :(
Thanks for digging them out, anyway.