2005-01-02 20:15:25

by Sam Ravnborg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: kconfig: help includes dependency information

On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 05:02:55AM +0100, Ingo Oeser wrote:
>
> I would prefer this information at the END of the help text,
> since it is actually most useful to developers and more advanced users
> and thus equals in value to the old notice how a module is called.

Thats where it is placed.

> Using the verbose config information and linking to their help texts would
> make it even more user friendly in my opinion.
verbose config option - please explain what you have in mind here.

> "depends on:" is not really needed, since you usually cannot select any
> option, where you didn't fulfill the dependencies, AFAICS.
It is sometimes usefull to see what a specific config option is dependent
of. But you are right that it is not visible in menuconfig (today) when
"depends on" is not satisfied.

I'm digging through Petr Baudis patch to link lxdialog with kconfig -
and when finished I may look into extending menuconfig a bit.

Sam


2005-01-03 19:25:56

by Ingo Oeser

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: kconfig: help includes dependency information

Hi Sam,
hi Roman,

Sam Ravnborg schrieb:
> > Using the verbose config information and linking to their help texts
> > would make it even more user friendly in my opinion.
>
> verbose config option - please explain what you have in mind here.

Example from drivers/char/Kconfig:

SERIAL_NONSTANDARD - the config option
"Non-standard serial port support" - the verbose config option

please present the latter to the user, if not done already.

> > "depends on:" is not really needed, since you usually cannot select any
> > option, where you didn't fulfill the dependencies, AFAICS.
>
> It is sometimes usefull to see what a specific config option is dependent
> of. But you are right that it is not visible in menuconfig (today) when
> "depends on" is not satisfied.

Yes, I've been told later, that you see that in xconfig. I only
use either menuconfig or oldconfig, so I've never seen that before ;-)

Regards

Ingo Oeser