Hi all,
I am trying to add some cryptographic functionality to ext2 file system for my masters project. I am working with kernel 2.4.21
since the routines do_generic_file_read and do_generic_file_write are used in reading and writing, I am decrypting and encrypting the data in the resp. functions. This is working fine for regular data files. If I try to copy / execute executable files, I am getting segmentation fault. In kernel messages, I see same functions (read and write) getting called for the executables also. If I comment encrypt/decrypt functions, its working fine.
Now since it is working for regular text files, I suppose there is not a problem in my encrypt/decrypt routines, then what might be going wrong?
Thanks and regards,
Vineet
_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
This is just a thought.
Text files are better able to handle small faults. ie an extra space or
characters or even an unreadable piece of data might not cause the file to
become unreadable by most text editors. Binary files aren't as flexible.
Every bit could be an instruction to the processor and might cause a seg
fault.
Just to test the theory, I would start by making the encrypt decrypt
function only effect the first byte. If doing this doesn't cause a seg
fault, I would recheck my decrypt encrypt algorithm to make sure it doesn't
pad or expand at any point. maybe use them on a regular file and the an
md5sum on the file before and after, just to make extra sure.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vineet Joglekar" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 8:58 AM
Subject: Problem in accessing executable files
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to add some cryptographic functionality to ext2 file system
for my masters project. I am working with kernel 2.4.21
>
> since the routines do_generic_file_read and do_generic_file_write are used
in reading and writing, I am decrypting and encrypting the data in the resp.
functions. This is working fine for regular data files. If I try to copy /
execute executable files, I am getting segmentation fault. In kernel
messages, I see same functions (read and write) getting called for the
executables also. If I comment encrypt/decrypt functions, its working fine.
>
> Now since it is working for regular text files, I suppose there is not a
problem in my encrypt/decrypt routines, then what might be going wrong?
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Vineet
>
> _______________________________________________
> Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
> The most personalized portal on the Web!
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-c-programming" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi John,
Thanks for suggesting the single / few bytes encryption test. I tried doing that, but in vain. Maybe I am going wrong somewhere else.
I will briefly tell the functions I have written and the sequence if I am doing any mistake in the logic, please let me know.
In file.c I have added the info about the functions my_generic_file_read and my_generic_file_write in ext2_file_operations.
For decrypting, the sequence is:
my_generic_file_read ---> my_do_generic_file_read ---> my_file_read_actor ---> my_decrypt_data
I have not made any changes in my_generic_file_read and my_do_generic_file_read. In the function my_file_read_actor, I copy the page to my buffer (1 page - allocated at the time of mounting) I decrypt that buffer and pass it to the __copy_to_user() function.
for encrypting, the sequence is:
my_generic_file_write ---> my_encrypt_data
In function my_generic_file_write, between functions __copy_from_user() and commit_write(), I am calling my_encrypt_data() by passing address of the page that is passed to __copy_from_user()
My encrypt / decrypt routine is very basic at this time - just xoring every byte of the page as:
*to = *to ^ 0xff; *to++;
If I change my encrypt/decrypt routines to encrypt / decrypt just first or last byte of the page, then I get a different error saying the file is not executable - when I try to execute it. I thought there might be a problem with executable header, but I guess when I encrypt last byte of the page, header should have been bypassed.
Is it something like, for executables, the data is refered in some other functions - that is, before do_generic_file_read geting called?
Thanks and regards,
Vineet
--- On Tue 02/01, John T. Williams < [email protected] > wrote:
From: John T. Williams [mailto: [email protected]]
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:37:30 -0500
Subject: Re: Problem in accessing executable files
This is just a thought.<br><br>Text files are better able to handle small faults. ie an extra space or<br>characters or even an unreadable piece of data might not cause the file to<br>become unreadable by most text editors. Binary files aren't as flexible.<br>Every bit could be an instruction to the processor and might cause a seg<br>fault.<br><br>Just to test the theory, I would start by making the encrypt decrypt<br>function only effect the first byte. If doing this doesn't cause a seg<br>fault, I would recheck my decrypt encrypt algorithm to make sure it doesn't<br>pad or expand at any point. maybe use them on a regular file and the an<br>md5sum on the file before and after, just to make extra sure.<br><br><br>----- Original Message ----- <br>From: "Vineet Joglekar" <[email protected]><br>To: <[email protected]><br>Cc: <[email protected]><br>Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 8:58 AM<br>Subject: Problem in accessing executable files<br><br><br>><br>> Hi all,<br>><br>> I am trying to add some cryptographic functionality to ext2 file system<br>for my masters project. I am working with kernel 2.4.21<br>><br>> since the routines do_generic_file_read and do_generic_file_write are used<br>in reading and writing, I am decrypting and encrypting the data in the resp.<br>functions. This is working fine for regular data files. If I try to copy /<br>execute executable files, I am getting segmentation fault. In kernel<br>messages, I see same functions (read and write) getting called for the<br>executables also. If I comment encrypt/decrypt functions, its working fine.<br>><br>> Now since it is working for regular text files, I suppose there is not a<br>problem in my encrypt/decrypt routines, then what might be going wrong?<br>><br>> Thanks and regards,<br>><br>> Vineet<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com<br>> The most personalized portal on the Web!<br>> -<br>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe<br>l!
inux-c-p
rogramming" in<br>> the body of a message to [email protected]<br>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html<br><br><br>
_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
Hi all,
1 more interesting observation regarding my executable file problem.
If I copy an executable say "prac" from ext2 fs to my encrypted fs as prac1, prac1 doesnt run on the encrypted fs. but, if I make another copy, from prac1 to normal ext2 fs, as prac2, then the prac2 executes properly on normal file system. that means my encryption, decryption functions are getting executed properly while using that executable as normal file to read and write, but something else is happening when I try to execute it. I am failing to understand what am I missing.
Vineet
--- On Sun 02/06, Vineet Joglekar < [email protected] > wrote:
From: Vineet Joglekar [mailto: [email protected]]
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 17:41:01 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Problem in accessing executable files
<br>Hi John,<br><br>Thanks for suggesting the single / few bytes encryption test. I tried doing that, but in vain. Maybe I am going wrong somewhere else.<br><br>I will briefly tell the functions I have written and the sequence if I am doing any mistake in the logic, please let me know.<br>In file.c I have added the info about the functions my_generic_file_read and my_generic_file_write in ext2_file_operations.<br><br>For decrypting, the sequence is:<br>my_generic_file_read ---> my_do_generic_file_read ---> my_file_read_actor ---> my_decrypt_data<br><br>I have not made any changes in my_generic_file_read and my_do_generic_file_read. In the function my_file_read_actor, I copy the page to my buffer (1 page - allocated at the time of mounting) I decrypt that buffer and pass it to the __copy_to_user() function.<br><br>for encrypting, the sequence is:<br>my_generic_file_write ---> my_encrypt_data<br><br>In function my_generic_file_write, between functions __copy_from_user() and commit_write(), I am calling my_encrypt_data() by passing address of the page that is passed to __copy_from_user()<br><br>My encrypt / decrypt routine is very basic at this time - just xoring every byte of the page as:<br>*to = *to ^ 0xff; *to++;<br><br>If I change my encrypt/decrypt routines to encrypt / decrypt just first or last byte of the page, then I get a different error saying the file is not executable - when I try to execute it. I thought there might be a problem with executable header, but I guess when I encrypt last byte of the page, header should have been bypassed.<br><br>Is it something like, for executables, the data is refered in some other functions - that is, before do_generic_file_read geting called?<br><br>Thanks and regards,<br><br>Vineet<br><br> --- On Tue 02/01, John T. Williams < [email protected] > wrote:<br>From: John T. Williams [mailto: [email protected]]<br>To: [email protected], [email protected]<br> Cc: [email protected]<br>Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:37:30 -0500<br>Subject:!
Re: Pro
blem in accessing executable files<br><br>This is just a thought.<br><br>Text files are better able to handle small faults. ie an extra space or<br>characters or even an unreadable piece of data might not cause the file to<br>become unreadable by most text editors. Binary files aren't as flexible.<br>Every bit could be an instruction to the processor and might cause a seg<br>fault.<br><br>Just to test the theory, I would start by making the encrypt decrypt<br>function only effect the first byte. If doing this doesn't cause a seg<br>fault, I would recheck my decrypt encrypt algorithm to make sure it doesn't<br>pad or expand at any point. maybe use them on a regular file and the an<br>md5sum on the file before and after, just to make extra sure.<br><br><br>----- Original Message ----- <br>From: "Vineet Joglekar" <[email protected]><br>To: <[email protected]><br>Cc: <[email protected]><br>Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 8:58 AM<br>Subject: Problem in accessing executable files<br><br><br>><br>> Hi all,<br>><br>> I am trying to add some cryptographic functionality to ext2 file system<br>for my masters project. I am working with kernel 2.4.21<br>><br>> since the routines do_generic_file_read and do_generic_file_write are used<br>in reading and writing, I am decrypting and encrypting the data in the resp.<br>functions. This is working fine for regular data files. If I try to copy /<br>execute executable files, I am getting segmentation fault. In kernel<br>messages, I see same functions (read and write) getting called for the<br>executables also. If I comment encrypt/decrypt functions, its working fine.<br>><br>> Now since it is working for regular text files, I suppose there is not a<br>problem in my encrypt/decrypt routines, then what might be going wrong?<br>><br>> Thanks and regards,<br>><br>> Vineet<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com<br>> The most personalized portal on the Web!<br>> -<br>> To unsubscribe from !
this lis
t:
send the line "unsubscribe<br>linux-c-programming" in<br>> the body of a message to [email protected]<br>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html<br><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com<br>The most personalized portal on the Web!<br>-<br>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-c-programming" in<br>the body of a message to [email protected]<br>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html<br>
_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 07:14:27PM -0500, Vineet Joglekar wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> 1 more interesting observation regarding my executable file problem.
>
>
>
> If I copy an executable say "prac" from ext2 fs to my encrypted fs as prac1, prac1 doesnt run on the encrypted fs. but, if I make another copy, from prac1 to normal ext2 fs, as prac2, then the prac2 executes properly on normal file system. that means my encryption, decryption functions are getting executed properly while using that executable as normal file to read and write, but something else is happening when I try to execute it. I am failing to understand what am I missing.
1) 6 or 7 newlines
2) mmap()