2005-02-15 03:03:00

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] Consolidate compat_sys_waitid

Hi all,

This patch does:
- consolidate the three implementations of compat_sys_waitid
(some were called sys32_waitid).
- adds sys_waitid syscall to ppc
- adds sys_waitid and compat_sys_waitid syscalls to ppc64

Parisc seemed to assume th existance of compat_sys_waitid. The MIPS
syscall tables have me confused and may need updating. I have arbitrarily
chosen the next available syscall number on ppc and ppc64, I hope this is
correct.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>

Comments?

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

diff -ruNp linus-bk/arch/ia64/ia32/ia32_entry.S linus-bk-waitid.1/arch/ia64/ia32/ia32_entry.S
--- linus-bk/arch/ia64/ia32/ia32_entry.S 2005-01-16 07:07:51.000000000 +1100
+++ linus-bk-waitid.1/arch/ia64/ia32/ia32_entry.S 2005-02-15 12:12:21.000000000 +1100
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ ia32_syscall_table:
data8 compat_sys_mq_notify
data8 compat_sys_mq_getsetattr
data8 sys_ni_syscall /* reserved for kexec */
- data8 sys32_waitid
+ data8 compat_sys_waitid

// guard against failures to increase IA32_NR_syscalls
.org ia32_syscall_table + 8*IA32_NR_syscalls
diff -ruNp linus-bk/arch/ia64/ia32/sys_ia32.c linus-bk-waitid.1/arch/ia64/ia32/sys_ia32.c
--- linus-bk/arch/ia64/ia32/sys_ia32.c 2005-02-11 13:05:29.000000000 +1100
+++ linus-bk-waitid.1/arch/ia64/ia32/sys_ia32.c 2005-02-15 12:16:35.000000000 +1100
@@ -2633,32 +2633,6 @@ long sys32_fadvise64_64(int fd, __u32 of
advice);
}

-asmlinkage long sys32_waitid(int which, compat_pid_t pid,
- compat_siginfo_t __user *uinfo, int options,
- struct compat_rusage __user *uru)
-{
- siginfo_t info;
- struct rusage ru;
- long ret;
- mm_segment_t old_fs = get_fs();
-
- info.si_signo = 0;
- set_fs (KERNEL_DS);
- ret = sys_waitid(which, pid, (siginfo_t __user *) &info, options,
- uru ? (struct rusage __user *) &ru : NULL);
- set_fs (old_fs);
-
- if (ret < 0 || info.si_signo == 0)
- return ret;
-
- if (uru && (ret = put_compat_rusage(&ru, uru)))
- return ret;
-
- BUG_ON(info.si_code & __SI_MASK);
- info.si_code |= __SI_CHLD;
- return copy_siginfo_to_user32(uinfo, &info);
-}
-
#ifdef NOTYET /* UNTESTED FOR IA64 FROM HERE DOWN */

asmlinkage long sys32_setreuid(compat_uid_t ruid, compat_uid_t euid)
diff -ruNp linus-bk/arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S linus-bk-waitid.1/arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S
--- linus-bk/arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S 2005-01-04 17:05:28.000000000 +1100
+++ linus-bk-waitid.1/arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S 2005-02-15 13:12:01.000000000 +1100
@@ -1450,3 +1450,4 @@ _GLOBAL(sys_call_table)
.long sys_add_key
.long sys_request_key /* 270 */
.long sys_keyctl
+ .long sys_waitid
diff -ruNp linus-bk/arch/ppc64/kernel/misc.S linus-bk-waitid.1/arch/ppc64/kernel/misc.S
--- linus-bk/arch/ppc64/kernel/misc.S 2005-01-16 07:07:51.000000000 +1100
+++ linus-bk-waitid.1/arch/ppc64/kernel/misc.S 2005-02-15 13:13:51.000000000 +1100
@@ -939,6 +939,7 @@ _GLOBAL(sys_call_table32)
.llong .sys32_add_key
.llong .sys32_request_key
.llong .compat_sys_keyctl
+ .llong .compat_sys_waitid

.balign 8
_GLOBAL(sys_call_table)
@@ -1214,3 +1215,4 @@ _GLOBAL(sys_call_table)
.llong .sys_add_key
.llong .sys_request_key /* 270 */
.llong .sys_keyctl
+ .llong .sys_waitid
diff -ruNp linus-bk/arch/sparc64/kernel/sys_sparc32.c linus-bk-waitid.1/arch/sparc64/kernel/sys_sparc32.c
--- linus-bk/arch/sparc64/kernel/sys_sparc32.c 2005-02-11 13:05:29.000000000 +1100
+++ linus-bk-waitid.1/arch/sparc64/kernel/sys_sparc32.c 2005-02-15 12:01:55.000000000 +1100
@@ -1653,34 +1653,3 @@ sys32_timer_create(u32 clock, struct sig

return err;
}
-
-asmlinkage long compat_sys_waitid(u32 which, u32 pid,
- struct compat_siginfo __user *uinfo,
- u32 options, struct compat_rusage __user *uru)
-{
- siginfo_t info;
- struct rusage ru;
- long ret;
- mm_segment_t old_fs = get_fs();
-
- memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
-
- set_fs (KERNEL_DS);
- ret = sys_waitid(which, pid, (siginfo_t __user *) &info,
- options,
- uru ? (struct rusage __user *) &ru : NULL);
- set_fs (old_fs);
-
- if (ret < 0 || info.si_signo == 0)
- return ret;
-
- if (uru) {
- ret = put_compat_rusage(&ru, uru);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- }
-
- BUG_ON(info.si_code & __SI_MASK);
- info.si_code |= __SI_CHLD;
- return copy_siginfo_to_user32(uinfo, &info);
-}
diff -ruNp linus-bk/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S linus-bk-waitid.1/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S
--- linus-bk/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S 2005-01-16 11:05:29.000000000 +1100
+++ linus-bk-waitid.1/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S 2005-02-15 12:11:52.000000000 +1100
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ ia32_sys_call_table:
.quad compat_sys_mq_notify
.quad compat_sys_mq_getsetattr
.quad quiet_ni_syscall /* reserved for kexec */
- .quad sys32_waitid
+ .quad compat_sys_waitid
.quad quiet_ni_syscall /* sys_altroot */
.quad sys_add_key
.quad sys_request_key
diff -ruNp linus-bk/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c linus-bk-waitid.1/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c
--- linus-bk/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c 2005-02-04 04:10:36.000000000 +1100
+++ linus-bk-waitid.1/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c 2005-02-15 12:17:04.000000000 +1100
@@ -955,32 +955,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys32_clone(unsigned int
return do_fork(clone_flags, newsp, regs, 0, parent_tid, child_tid);
}

-asmlinkage long sys32_waitid(int which, compat_pid_t pid,
- compat_siginfo_t __user *uinfo, int options,
- struct compat_rusage __user *uru)
-{
- siginfo_t info;
- struct rusage ru;
- long ret;
- mm_segment_t old_fs = get_fs();
-
- info.si_signo = 0;
- set_fs (KERNEL_DS);
- ret = sys_waitid(which, pid, (siginfo_t __user *) &info, options,
- uru ? &ru : NULL);
- set_fs (old_fs);
-
- if (ret < 0 || info.si_signo == 0)
- return ret;
-
- if (uru && (ret = put_compat_rusage(&ru, uru)))
- return ret;
-
- BUG_ON(info.si_code & __SI_MASK);
- info.si_code |= __SI_CHLD;
- return copy_siginfo_to_user32(uinfo, &info);
-}
-
/*
* Some system calls that need sign extended arguments. This could be done by a generic wrapper.
*/
diff -ruNp linus-bk/include/asm-ppc/unistd.h linus-bk-waitid.1/include/asm-ppc/unistd.h
--- linus-bk/include/asm-ppc/unistd.h 2005-01-04 17:05:28.000000000 +1100
+++ linus-bk-waitid.1/include/asm-ppc/unistd.h 2005-02-15 13:08:22.000000000 +1100
@@ -276,8 +276,9 @@
#define __NR_add_key 269
#define __NR_request_key 270
#define __NR_keyctl 271
+#define __NR_waitid 272

-#define __NR_syscalls 272
+#define __NR_syscalls 273

#define __NR(n) #n

diff -ruNp linus-bk/include/asm-ppc64/unistd.h linus-bk-waitid.1/include/asm-ppc64/unistd.h
--- linus-bk/include/asm-ppc64/unistd.h 2005-01-05 17:06:08.000000000 +1100
+++ linus-bk-waitid.1/include/asm-ppc64/unistd.h 2005-02-15 13:07:33.000000000 +1100
@@ -282,8 +282,9 @@
#define __NR_add_key 269
#define __NR_request_key 270
#define __NR_keyctl 271
+#define __NR_waitid 272

-#define __NR_syscalls 272
+#define __NR_syscalls 273
#ifdef __KERNEL__
#define NR_syscalls __NR_syscalls
#endif
diff -ruNp linus-bk/include/linux/compat.h linus-bk-waitid.1/include/linux/compat.h
--- linus-bk/include/linux/compat.h 2005-01-05 17:06:08.000000000 +1100
+++ linus-bk-waitid.1/include/linux/compat.h 2005-02-15 13:22:13.000000000 +1100
@@ -81,6 +81,12 @@ struct compat_rusage {

extern int put_compat_rusage(const struct rusage *, struct compat_rusage __user *);

+struct compat_siginfo;
+
+extern asmlinkage long compat_sys_waitid(u32, u32,
+ struct compat_siginfo __user *, u32,
+ struct compat_rusage __user *);
+
struct compat_dirent {
u32 d_ino;
compat_off_t d_off;
@@ -143,7 +149,6 @@ long compat_get_bitmap(unsigned long *ma
unsigned long bitmap_size);
long compat_put_bitmap(compat_ulong_t __user *umask, unsigned long *mask,
unsigned long bitmap_size);
-struct compat_siginfo;
int copy_siginfo_from_user32(siginfo_t *to, struct compat_siginfo __user *from);
int copy_siginfo_to_user32(struct compat_siginfo __user *to, siginfo_t *from);
#endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
diff -ruNp linus-bk/kernel/compat.c linus-bk-waitid.1/kernel/compat.c
--- linus-bk/kernel/compat.c 2005-01-16 07:07:51.000000000 +1100
+++ linus-bk-waitid.1/kernel/compat.c 2005-02-15 12:09:46.000000000 +1100
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/security.h>

#include <asm/uaccess.h>
+#include <asm/bug.h>

int get_compat_timespec(struct timespec *ts, const struct compat_timespec __user *cts)
{
@@ -413,6 +414,36 @@ compat_sys_wait4(compat_pid_t pid, compa
}
}

+asmlinkage long compat_sys_waitid(u32 which, u32 pid,
+ struct compat_siginfo __user *uinfo, u32 options,
+ struct compat_rusage __user *uru)
+{
+ siginfo_t info;
+ struct rusage ru;
+ long ret;
+ mm_segment_t old_fs = get_fs();
+
+ memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
+
+ set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
+ ret = sys_waitid(which, pid, (siginfo_t __user *)&info, options,
+ uru ? (struct rusage __user *)&ru : NULL);
+ set_fs(old_fs);
+
+ if ((ret < 0) || (info.si_signo == 0))
+ return ret;
+
+ if (uru) {
+ ret = put_compat_rusage(&ru, uru);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ BUG_ON(info.si_code & __SI_MASK);
+ info.si_code |= __SI_CHLD;
+ return copy_siginfo_to_user32(uinfo, &info);
+}
+
static int compat_get_user_cpu_mask(compat_ulong_t __user *user_mask_ptr,
unsigned len, cpumask_t *new_mask)
{


2005-02-15 09:52:03

by Andi Kleen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Consolidate compat_sys_waitid

On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 02:01:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> +asmlinkage long compat_sys_waitid(u32 which, u32 pid,
> + struct compat_siginfo __user *uinfo, u32 options,
> + struct compat_rusage __user *uru)
> +{
> + siginfo_t info;
> + struct rusage ru;
> + long ret;
> + mm_segment_t old_fs = get_fs();
> +
> + memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
> +
> + set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
> + ret = sys_waitid(which, pid, (siginfo_t __user *)&info, options,
> + uru ? (struct rusage __user *)&ru : NULL);
> + set_fs(old_fs);

I don't think this will work for sparc64/s390/UML etc.
They cannot access kernel data inside KERNEL_DS. You would need to use
compat_alloc_user_space() for ru

-Andi

2005-02-15 11:06:21

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Consolidate compat_sys_waitid

Hi Andi,

On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:51:53 +0100 Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I don't think this will work for sparc64/s390/UML etc.
> They cannot access kernel data inside KERNEL_DS. You would need to use
> compat_alloc_user_space() for ru

.. and, presumably, for info as well. Interestingly, this code
came directly from sparc64 ...

However, if you are right, there are quite a few other compat sys calls
that should not be working either.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

2005-02-15 11:11:09

by Andi Kleen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Consolidate compat_sys_waitid

On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:06:14PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andi,
>
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:51:53 +0100 Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I don't think this will work for sparc64/s390/UML etc.
> > They cannot access kernel data inside KERNEL_DS. You would need to use
> > compat_alloc_user_space() for ru
>
> .. and, presumably, for info as well. Interestingly, this code
> came directly from sparc64 ...

Sorry, I misread the code. In this case it's actually ok.

The only thing that doesn't work is mixing the pointers (e.g. accessing
user mode pointers inside KERNEL_DS)

So the patch is fine.

-Andi

2005-02-15 18:10:23

by Tony Luck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Consolidate compat_sys_waitid


>This patch does:
> - consolidate the three implementations of compat_sys_waitid
> (some were called sys32_waitid).
> - adds sys_waitid syscall to ppc
> - adds sys_waitid and compat_sys_waitid syscalls to ppc64
>
>Parisc seemed to assume th existance of compat_sys_waitid. The MIPS
>syscall tables have me confused and may need updating. I have arbitrarily
>chosen the next available syscall number on ppc and ppc64, I hope this is
>correct.
>
>Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
>
>Comments?

Compiles cleanly, and my test case runs on ia64.

Acked-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>

-Tony

2005-02-15 18:43:43

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Consolidate compat_sys_waitid

On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:01:49 +1100
Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:

> This patch does:
> - consolidate the three implementations of compat_sys_waitid
> (some were called sys32_waitid).
> - adds sys_waitid syscall to ppc
> - adds sys_waitid and compat_sys_waitid syscalls to ppc64
>
> Parisc seemed to assume th existance of compat_sys_waitid. The MIPS
> syscall tables have me confused and may need updating. I have arbitrarily
> chosen the next available syscall number on ppc and ppc64, I hope this is
> correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
>
> Comments?

Looks good to me.

2005-02-15 18:45:37

by Matthew Wilcox

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Consolidate compat_sys_waitid

On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 02:01:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Parisc seemed to assume th existance of compat_sys_waitid.

PA-RISC already has a compat_sys_waitid ;-P

The reason it isn't in Linus' tree yet is that it depends on the
is_compat_task() predicate which Andi vetoed out of Andrew's tree.
As a result, I haven't been able to merge any of the compat stuff
sitting in the PA tree. A few more voices in favour of reintroducing
is_compat_task() would help.

> @@ -413,6 +414,36 @@ compat_sys_wait4(compat_pid_t pid, compa
> }
> }
>
> +asmlinkage long compat_sys_waitid(u32 which, u32 pid,
> + struct compat_siginfo __user *uinfo, u32 options,
> + struct compat_rusage __user *uru)

Some subtle differences which I feel incompetent to diagnose ... ours
looks like:

asmlinkage int compat_sys_waitid(int which, pid_t pid,
compat_siginfo_t __user *infop, int options,
struct compat_rusage __user *ru)


> + BUG_ON(info.si_code & __SI_MASK);
> + info.si_code |= __SI_CHLD;
> + return copy_siginfo_to_user32(uinfo, &info);
> +}

Other than variable names, we're identical to this point:

/* Tell copy_siginfo_to_user that it was __SI_CHLD */
ksiginfo.si_code |= __SI_CHLD;

if (compat_copy_siginfo_to_user(infop, &ksiginfo) != 0)
return -EFAULT;

return 0;
}

--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain

2005-02-15 19:24:10

by Andi Kleen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Consolidate compat_sys_waitid

> The reason it isn't in Linus' tree yet is that it depends on the
> is_compat_task() predicate which Andi vetoed out of Andrew's tree.
> As a result, I haven't been able to merge any of the compat stuff
> sitting in the PA tree. A few more voices in favour of reintroducing
> is_compat_task() would help.

Just change PA-RISC to not need is_compat_task? It's not that
difficult really, you just have to split the parts that need
to know about this into separate functions and files.

-Andi

2005-02-15 19:28:48

by Al Viro

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Consolidate compat_sys_waitid

On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 08:23:41PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > The reason it isn't in Linus' tree yet is that it depends on the
> > is_compat_task() predicate which Andi vetoed out of Andrew's tree.
> > As a result, I haven't been able to merge any of the compat stuff
> > sitting in the PA tree. A few more voices in favour of reintroducing
> > is_compat_task() would help.
>
> Just change PA-RISC to not need is_compat_task? It's not that
> difficult really, you just have to split the parts that need
> to know about this into separate functions and files.

Seconded. Come on, folks, you *know* that is_compat_task() is an invitation
for massive fuckups by driver-writers...

2005-02-15 19:36:52

by Daniel Jacobowitz

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Consolidate compat_sys_waitid

On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 02:01:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch does:
> - consolidate the three implementations of compat_sys_waitid
> (some were called sys32_waitid).
> - adds sys_waitid syscall to ppc
> - adds sys_waitid and compat_sys_waitid syscalls to ppc64
>
> Parisc seemed to assume th existance of compat_sys_waitid. The MIPS
> syscall tables have me confused and may need updating. I have arbitrarily
> chosen the next available syscall number on ppc and ppc64, I hope this is
> correct.

I posted a (not-consolidated) sys32_waitid to the MIPS list on Sunday.
The syscall tables should confuse you :-) N32 needs to use compat
versions of most structures, but not siginfo_t. O32 needs to use
compat versions of everything. Your new version can replace the
sys32_waitid from my patch, but not sysn32_waitid.

Ralf, I'll let you sort it out :-)

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

2005-02-16 00:06:45

by Paul Mackerras

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Consolidate compat_sys_waitid

Stephen Rothwell writes:

> This patch does:
> - consolidate the three implementations of compat_sys_waitid
> (some were called sys32_waitid).
> - adds sys_waitid syscall to ppc
> - adds sys_waitid and compat_sys_waitid syscalls to ppc64

Looks good to me. Are you going to submit it to Andrew?

Paul.

2005-02-18 05:22:46

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Consolidate compat_sys_waitid

On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:43:07 +0000 Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 02:01:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > +asmlinkage long compat_sys_waitid(u32 which, u32 pid,
> > + struct compat_siginfo __user *uinfo, u32 options,
> > + struct compat_rusage __user *uru)
>
> Some subtle differences which I feel incompetent to diagnose ... ours
> looks like:
>
> asmlinkage int compat_sys_waitid(int which, pid_t pid,
> compat_siginfo_t __user *infop, int options,
> struct compat_rusage __user *ru)

They are u32 in my version because we decided that the kernel zero extends
the compat syscall parameters.

> Other than variable names, we're identical to this point:
>
> /* Tell copy_siginfo_to_user that it was __SI_CHLD */
> ksiginfo.si_code |= __SI_CHLD;
>
> if (compat_copy_siginfo_to_user(infop, &ksiginfo) != 0)

Every other relevant architecture has copy_siginfo_to_user32 which returns
0/-EFAULT. And it is declared in linux/compat.h. I like your name
better, but that is a different patch.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/